Table VII.D.3.a(2002) Percent of total premiums for exclusive-provider plans contributed by employees enrolled in family coverage at private-sector establishments that offer health insurance by proportion of employees who are full-time or low-wage and State: United States, 2002: (43 States are shown separately)
 
 

 

Percent Full-Time Employees

Percent Low-Wage Employees **

Division and State

Total

 

75% or more

 

50-74%

 

Less than 50%

 

50% or more

 

Less than 50%

 

Unknown

 
 
United States

25.5%

24.8%

30.2%

29.6%

32.6%

26.2%

23.2%

 
New England:
Connecticut

26.9%

26.0%

36.3%

20.6%

*

37.6%

29.8%

21.1%

Maine

35.6%

32.8%

45.1%

54.6%

51.2%

35.3%

31.0%

*
Massachusetts

24.6%

23.2%

28.8%

39.6%

31.8%

23.9%

26.0%

New Hampshire

26.1%

26.6%

19.2%

28.2%

31.0%

26.8%

20.4%

 
Middle Atlantic:
New Jersey

19.3%

18.9%

19.8%

*

28.2%

*

26.6%

16.2%

21.7%

New York

22.6%

23.2%

19.0%

*

28.2%

*

36.8%

21.8%

19.8%

Pennsylvania

19.4%

18.4%

31.5%

13.5%

*

11.0%

*

17.9%

22.0%

 
East North Central:
Illinois

23.9%

21.9%

34.3%

*

47.5%

41.0%

26.3%

20.1%

Indiana

23.8%

23.4%

22.7%

*

28.8%

*

74.0%

19.9%

24.5%

Michigan

16.2%

14.2%

22.3%

*

28.4%

35.6%

11.4%

16.2%

Ohio

31.1%

29.8%

36.3%

52.1%

44.9%

40.4%

18.4%

Wisconsin

17.7%

14.8%

*

34.3%

15.1%

20.1%

*

24.1%

10.2%

*
 
West North Central:
Iowa

21.8%

20.1%

32.0%

*

23.2%

*

28.4%

23.6%

14.1%

*
Kansas

24.4%

23.1%

29.0%

*

31.8%

*

28.0%

*

24.0%

24.5%

*
Minnesota

25.7%

22.6%

46.2%

26.9%

*

20.5%

*

26.6%

24.5%

Missouri

27.0%

27.6%

26.3%

*

19.9%

*

17.5%

*

32.4%

15.2%

*
Nebraska

26.1%

25.0%

41.8%

.

23.6%

*

26.1%

28.2%

 
South Atlantic:
Delaware

18.3%

19.0%

13.3%

*

15.7%

31.5%

24.0%

13.0%

*
Florida

27.3%

26.5%

42.5%

40.2%

38.8%

29.3%

22.7%

Georgia

31.4%

32.5%

36.7%

*

16.1%

39.8%

40.5%

20.7%

Maryland

32.2%

30.9%

52.6%

23.5%

42.9%

36.4%

26.6%

North Carolina

23.5%

23.1%

40.5%

45.8%

*

27.4%

23.2%

23.5%

*
South Carolina

30.6%

31.5%

21.5%

*

49.2%

*

30.2%

32.8%

29.4%

Virginia

35.2%

35.4%

27.4%

*

38.0%

34.9%

36.3%

34.7%

West Virginia

21.9%

22.3%

14.9%

*

25.0%

*

24.6%

18.7%

*

27.3%

 
East South Central:
Alabama

28.4%

28.2%

28.0%

*

39.8%

*

45.7%

36.6%

20.6%

Kentucky

25.0%

25.1%

19.9%

*

.

8.7%

*

19.4%

34.2%

Mississippi

28.7%

37.7%

*

.

.

.

38.9%

*

22.3%

*
Tennessee

24.0%

22.0%

36.6%

20.2%

*

32.4%

24.7%

22.4%

 
West South Central:
Louisiana

33.4%

34.4%

32.0%

20.9%

*

41.6%

34.0%

29.9%

Oklahoma

32.8%

32.2%

41.2%

60.5%

*

37.6%

37.6%

26.5%

Texas

28.0%

28.0%

19.8%

*

57.2%

46.6%

32.3%

18.0%

 
Mountain:
Arizona

28.3%

28.7%

26.7%

*

25.0%

*

40.7%

34.9%

22.6%

Colorado

24.3%

24.4%

20.2%

*

33.5%

31.9%

26.3%

17.8%

Montana

24.6%

*

25.3%

*

24.8%

*

2.4%

*

10.2%

*

27.6%

*

33.8%

Nevada

26.5%

25.3%

41.8%

.

37.5%

37.1%

15.6%

New Mexico

28.8%

28.4%

37.1%

23.1%

*

20.5%

*

31.2%

27.0%

Utah

24.9%

24.2%

47.5%

5.9%

28.0%

24.6%

24.6%

Wyoming

31.8%

32.2%

20.6%

*

50.0%

*

5.6%

*

30.5%

35.1%

 
Pacific:
California

28.2%

27.0%

39.7%

26.3%

*

31.1%

27.3%

29.4%

Hawaii

28.5%

29.9%

17.7%

38.0%

34.3%

24.0%

31.7%

Oregon

22.3%

19.7%

23.9%

*

33.4%

22.9%

*

24.0%

19.9%

*
Washington

15.4%

*

11.6%

*

36.9%

31.9%

*

6.7%

*

19.9%

*

17.6%

 
States not shown separately

29.6%

28.8%

31.5%

37.4%

57.0%

25.1%

45.5%

 
Source: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Center for Financing, Access and Cost Trends. 2002 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey-Insurance Component.
Note: Definitions and descriptions of the methods used for this survey can be found in the Technical Appendix.
* Figure does not meet standard of reliability or precision.
. Data suppressed due to high standard errors or no reported values in cell.
** The definition of low-wage employees changed in 2000. These data are not comparable to IC data prior to 2000. See Technical Appendix for details.

 

Table VII.D.3.a(2002) Standard error for percent of total premiums for exclusive-provider plans contributed by employees enrolled in family coverage at private-sector establishments that offer health insurance by proportion of employees who are full-time or low-wage and State: United States, 2002: (43 States are shown separately)
 
 

 

Percent Full-Time Employees

Percent Low-Wage Employees **

Division and State

Total

 

75% or more

 

50-74%

 

Less than 50%

 

50% or more

 

Less than 50%

 

Unknown

 
 
United States

0.79%

0.81%

2.63%

1.98%

2.08%

1.01%

1.47%

 
New England:
Connecticut

1.91%

2.17%

9.12%

6.55%

*

7.98%

1.86%

2.01%

Maine

1.58%

3.07%

7.11%

15.60%

10.75%

3.80%

10.12%

*
Massachusetts

1.54%

1.41%

4.47%

9.86%

8.61%

1.87%

2.23%

New Hampshire

2.18%

2.63%

5.46%

8.26%

7.87%

3.13%

3.78%

 
Middle Atlantic:
New Jersey

2.77%

3.24%

6.01%

*

8.89%

*

7.14%

4.72%

4.41%

New York

2.52%

2.79%

6.94%

*

12.57%

*

5.32%

3.03%

4.09%

Pennsylvania

2.32%

2.84%

4.63%

6.37%

*

4.06%

*

2.73%

5.77%

 
East North Central:
Illinois

2.17%

2.67%

10.86%

*

9.17%

10.69%

3.11%

3.11%

Indiana

3.28%

3.12%

7.39%

*

9.51%

*

16.98%

5.11%

3.83%

Michigan

2.64%

2.33%

7.66%

*

7.72%

10.39%

3.33%

1.88%

Ohio

5.07%

5.89%

7.86%

12.38%

10.12%

5.72%

2.58%

Wisconsin

3.96%

5.02%

*

7.98%

4.49%

9.11%

*

2.68%

10.09%

*
 
West North Central:
Iowa

3.05%

2.99%

11.97%

*

6.97%

*

6.02%

3.51%

7.70%

*
Kansas

3.76%

4.48%

9.40%

*

9.78%

*

10.85%

*

5.12%

8.60%

*
Minnesota

3.08%

3.28%

8.58%

11.81%

*

9.79%

*

3.44%

4.01%

Missouri

3.06%

4.13%

10.32%

*

8.40%

*

8.50%

*

3.45%

4.61%

*
Nebraska

3.92%

4.38%

9.87%

.

8.23%

*

6.66%

6.95%

 
South Atlantic:
Delaware

3.05%

3.65%

5.91%

*

3.96%

9.03%

5.42%

9.10%

*
Florida

3.90%

4.07%

10.67%

10.13%

8.14%

5.88%

4.25%

Georgia

2.32%

2.76%

11.09%

*

4.82%

11.56%

5.90%

2.57%

Maryland

1.48%

1.72%

11.30%

4.39%

9.59%

2.04%

1.25%

North Carolina

3.52%

3.55%

11.41%

14.48%

*

7.29%

4.69%

9.26%

*
South Carolina

2.86%

3.17%

7.91%

*

15.40%

*

8.24%

6.30%

5.47%

Virginia

3.06%

3.00%

9.89%

*

9.18%

8.11%

7.07%

6.18%

West Virginia

4.20%

4.92%

4.86%

*

11.18%

*

6.25%

5.84%

*

6.32%

 
East South Central:
Alabama

4.77%

4.68%

8.87%

*

14.31%

*

13.37%

5.54%

3.99%

Kentucky

6.14%

6.18%

6.60%

*

.

6.95%

*

3.45%

8.18%

Mississippi

7.53%

11.96%

*

.

.

.

12.10%

*

10.37%

*
Tennessee

2.93%

3.00%

8.73%

7.92%

*

8.32%

3.86%

3.72%

 
West South Central:
Louisiana

2.94%

3.16%

9.02%

6.34%

*

10.00%

6.07%

4.74%

Oklahoma

5.33%

5.60%

11.97%

19.14%

*

10.01%

8.52%

4.41%

Texas

2.05%

2.35%

10.50%

*

13.31%

8.59%

3.70%

1.71%

 
Mountain:
Arizona

3.27%

2.99%

8.57%

*

8.83%

*

11.20%

5.93%

5.13%

Colorado

5.49%

5.48%

8.18%

*

8.89%

8.07%

6.18%

4.48%

Montana

9.56%

*

9.87%

*

7.56%

*

2.01%

*

3.49%

*

10.18%

*

9.90%

Nevada

6.23%

6.09%

10.30%

.

10.98%

8.32%

4.52%

New Mexico

4.61%

4.73%

9.82%

10.24%

*

7.49%

*

5.39%

7.77%

Utah

2.53%

2.37%

12.22%

1.68%

7.97%

3.05%

6.59%

Wyoming

6.05%

6.83%

6.63%

*

15.81%

*

5.00%

*

8.54%

8.51%

 
Pacific:
California

3.18%

3.11%

7.72%

8.03%

*

5.22%

3.58%

4.50%

Hawaii

3.14%

4.56%

3.84%

7.04%

6.86%

2.99%

6.24%

Oregon

3.50%

4.52%

10.75%

*

9.59%

9.70%

*

4.34%

7.35%

*
Washington

4.88%

*

4.80%

*

10.30%

9.68%

*

2.12%

*

7.87%

*

3.52%

 
States not shown separately

2.63%

4.68%

8.59%

9.49%

12.44%

2.79%

9.79%

 
Source: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Center for Financing, Access and Cost Trends. 2002 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey-Insurance Component.
Note: Definitions and descriptions of the methods used for this survey can be found in the Technical Appendix.
* Figure does not meet standard of reliability or precision.
. Data suppressed due to high standard errors or no reported values in cell.
** The definition of low-wage employees changed in 2000. These data are not comparable to IC data prior to 2000. See Technical Appendix for details.