Table VII.C.3.a(2005) Percent of total premiums for exclusive-provider plans contributed by employees enrolled in single coverage at private-sector establishments that offer health insurance by proportion of employees who are full-time or low-wage and State: United States, 2005
 
 

 

Percent Full-Time Employees

Percent Low-Wage Employees **

Division and State

Total

 

75% or more

 

50-74%

 

Less than 50%

 

50% or more

 

Less than 50%

 
 
United States

18.3%

18.5%

16.2%

20.6%

23.9%

17.3%

 
New England:
Connecticut

17.3%

19.1%

8.4%

*

19.3%

*

8.3%

*

18.3%

Maine

15.6%

15.1%

15.7%

21.7%

15.9%

*

15.6%

Massachusetts

22.6%

22.1%

25.7%

26.4%

24.6%

22.5%

New Hampshire

26.1%

25.8%

27.4%

28.4%

*

17.9%

*

27.0%

Rhode Island

19.4%

19.3%

20.3%

19.2%

*

20.1%

19.2%

Vermont

18.3%

18.6%

14.9%

*

19.5%

*

20.0%

*

18.1%

 
Middle Atlantic:
New Jersey

15.0%

14.8%

14.4%

*

19.5%

*

16.2%

*

14.6%

New York

18.4%

19.4%

12.3%

*

20.3%

*

29.6%

16.9%

Pennsylvania

12.3%

12.6%

10.2%

15.0%

25.3%

10.2%

 
East North Central:
Illinois

31.1%

32.2%

21.8%

12.7%

49.9%

19.6%

Indiana

21.1%

21.4%

16.6%

*

.

20.4%

21.2%

Michigan

20.6%

21.4%

16.9%

12.0%

25.3%

20.1%

Ohio

16.7%

16.2%

22.1%

9.2%

24.0%

14.7%

Wisconsin

26.6%

26.8%

24.7%

30.0%

26.2%

26.7%

 
West North Central:
Iowa

23.3%

21.0%

31.0%

33.5%

33.9%

21.8%

Kansas

21.2%

22.0%

25.6%

*

13.9%

*

7.4%

*

23.0%

Minnesota

19.9%

18.5%

24.5%

23.2%

*

18.8%

20.1%

Missouri

17.4%

17.7%

8.4%

*

50.3%

17.5%

*

17.4%

Nebraska

31.2%

32.9%

.

13.0%

*

20.1%

*

31.8%

North Dakota

18.7%

23.0%

2.9%

*

36.6%

*

13.7%

*

22.2%

*
South Dakota

23.6%

23.2%

37.1%

*

15.5%

*

38.6%

20.2%

 
South Atlantic:
Delaware

16.5%

16.2%

12.0%

*

34.3%

13.6%

*

16.9%

District of Columbia

15.7%

16.0%

14.6%

*

1.3%

*

1.4%

*

16.1%

Florida

20.9%

19.4%

27.9%

36.5%

19.5%

21.2%

Georgia

20.3%

19.1%

43.7%

26.4%

*

26.4%

*

19.6%

Maryland

19.8%

16.9%

29.6%

36.9%

16.0%

20.8%

North Carolina

16.4%

14.6%

33.4%

*

30.1%

10.5%

*

16.9%

South Carolina

19.7%

18.5%

*

31.8%

*

7.8%

*

16.0%

*

21.2%

*
Virginia

19.8%

19.1%

15.9%

41.2%

24.4%

19.2%

West Virginia

13.8%

14.7%

6.5%

*

21.8%

19.1%

12.2%

 
East South Central:
Alabama

29.4%

30.2%

29.4%

16.7%

*

28.8%

30.0%

Kentucky

28.4%

29.1%

25.0%

31.9%

*

26.6%

*

29.4%

Mississippi

16.6%

15.5%

22.3%

4.9%

*

13.8%

*

17.0%

Tennessee

20.9%

20.8%

21.8%

35.5%

*

29.6%

19.5%

 
West South Central:
Arkansas

17.3%

16.8%

*

17.2%

*

31.1%

*

28.7%

12.4%

*
Louisiana

17.3%

18.8%

7.7%

*

11.4%

*

18.3%

*

16.9%

Oklahoma

15.9%

15.3%

18.3%

22.6%

*

21.9%

14.9%

Texas

16.8%

16.0%

20.7%

15.7%

*

18.9%

15.8%

 
Mountain:
Arizona

23.4%

23.9%

15.2%

22.2%

*

23.0%

23.4%

Colorado

18.7%

18.0%

21.0%

*

27.4%

26.6%

16.2%

Idaho

26.2%

26.3%

22.6%

52.3%

*

34.2%

25.6%

Montana

12.3%

15.2%

.

.

18.6%

11.5%

*
Nevada

12.1%

12.2%

10.8%

12.0%

*

30.7%

9.8%

New Mexico

22.0%

20.9%

28.0%

29.1%

*

35.5%

20.1%

Utah

25.3%

24.6%

18.2%

39.2%

26.5%

*

25.2%

Wyoming

25.3%

27.6%

.

24.9%

*

29.0%

*

24.1%

 
Pacific:
Alaska

16.0%

14.0%

3.3%

*

35.8%

33.8%

12.6%

California

15.1%

16.0%

8.9%

12.1%

*

20.5%

14.4%

Hawaii

10.7%

10.9%

8.2%

*

15.1%

*

7.7%

11.7%

Oregon

8.8%

*

8.5%

*

7.4%

*

21.4%

21.5%

6.6%

*
Washington

10.7%

*

10.6%

*

14.9%

6.8%

*

2.7%

*

13.6%

 
Source: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Center for Financing, Access and Cost Trends. 2005 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey-Insurance Component.
Note: Definitions and descriptions of the methods used for this survey can be found in the Technical Appendix.
* Figure does not meet standard of reliability or precision.
. Data suppressed due to high standard errors or no reported values in cell.
** The definition of low-wage employees changed in 2000. These data are not comparable to IC data prior to 2000. See Technical Appendix for details.

 

Table VII.C.3.a(2005) Standard error for percent of total premiums for exclusive-provider plans contributed by employees enrolled in single coverage at private-sector establishments that offer health insurance by proportion of employees who are full-time or low-wage and State: United States, 2005
 
 

 

Percent Full-Time Employees

Percent Low-Wage Employees **

Division and State

Total

 

75% or more

 

50-74%

 

Less than 50%

 

50% or more

 

Less than 50%

 
 
United States

0.68%

0.86%

0.89%

1.94%

2.61%

0.74%

 
New England:
Connecticut

2.79%

3.15%

4.32%

*

5.96%

*

3.46%

*

2.74%

Maine

2.02%

2.59%

3.90%

5.84%

5.82%

*

1.81%

Massachusetts

1.19%

1.23%

5.86%

5.33%

5.57%

1.13%

New Hampshire

1.79%

2.47%

7.43%

9.90%

*

9.90%

*

2.12%

Rhode Island

2.44%

2.39%

5.40%

6.41%

*

5.43%

2.84%

Vermont

2.82%

2.95%

5.67%

*

7.80%

*

8.16%

*

2.75%

 
Middle Atlantic:
New Jersey

2.13%

2.48%

7.07%

*

7.77%

*

5.85%

*

1.76%

New York

2.01%

2.41%

4.12%

*

7.84%

*

6.41%

1.44%

Pennsylvania

1.35%

1.79%

2.83%

3.95%

5.25%

1.39%

 
East North Central:
Illinois

5.99%

6.38%

3.98%

3.63%

14.37%

2.21%

Indiana

2.34%

2.36%

5.26%

*

.

5.61%

2.17%

Michigan

4.45%

5.24%

5.05%

3.57%

6.00%

4.66%

Ohio

1.96%

1.67%

5.76%

2.66%

4.54%

2.30%

Wisconsin

3.69%

3.24%

5.40%

8.12%

6.66%

3.93%

 
West North Central:
Iowa

2.20%

2.87%

8.48%

9.07%

7.95%

2.55%

Kansas

3.99%

6.47%

7.74%

*

4.35%

*

3.77%

*

3.94%

Minnesota

2.10%

2.14%

6.93%

7.10%

*

4.32%

2.06%

Missouri

3.19%

3.29%

5.38%

*

14.37%

7.57%

*

2.99%

Nebraska

6.54%

6.27%

.

4.12%

*

6.48%

*

6.44%

North Dakota

5.32%

6.47%

2.68%

*

11.01%

*

8.19%

*

7.19%

*
South Dakota

3.71%

3.52%

11.25%

*

5.96%

*

10.11%

3.89%

 
South Atlantic:
Delaware

2.90%

2.89%

6.59%

*

9.78%

7.41%

*

2.77%

District of Columbia

1.94%

1.92%

5.15%

*

1.01%

*

7.26%

*

1.95%

Florida

1.59%

1.73%

5.13%

10.38%

4.61%

2.61%

Georgia

3.03%

3.02%

10.93%

8.34%

*

7.94%

*

3.17%

Maryland

4.06%

2.35%

7.93%

10.39%

4.62%

4.11%

North Carolina

3.34%

4.05%

14.02%

*

8.55%

3.46%

*

4.97%

South Carolina

3.91%

5.83%

*

10.32%

*

5.78%

*

5.03%

*

6.95%

*
Virginia

2.29%

2.25%

4.50%

12.13%

5.10%

2.53%

West Virginia

3.27%

2.98%

4.26%

*

6.20%

4.12%

3.32%

 
East South Central:
Alabama

3.96%

3.56%

7.56%

5.07%

*

8.50%

5.53%

Kentucky

4.11%

5.16%

6.45%

11.81%

*

10.96%

*

5.66%

Mississippi

3.71%

3.83%

6.16%

2.17%

*

4.35%

*

4.31%

Tennessee

2.57%

2.73%

5.40%

10.74%

*

8.50%

2.88%

 
West South Central:
Arkansas

2.60%

8.98%

*

5.49%

*

11.82%

*

6.63%

9.36%

*
Louisiana

2.79%

2.58%

3.60%

*

3.46%

*

6.43%

*

3.76%

Oklahoma

2.69%

2.90%

4.47%

6.80%

*

6.08%

2.73%

Texas

1.55%

1.80%

5.48%

5.10%

*

4.37%

1.33%

 
Mountain:
Arizona

4.29%

4.32%

4.51%

7.03%

*

6.07%

4.49%

Colorado

1.58%

1.72%

7.03%

*

6.37%

5.40%

1.99%

Idaho

3.26%

5.81%

6.59%

16.55%

*

9.73%

4.17%

Montana

3.33%

3.61%

.

.

5.37%

3.60%

*
Nevada

2.46%

3.12%

3.24%

3.76%

*

8.98%

2.18%

New Mexico

2.60%

3.31%

6.60%

8.76%

*

8.20%

2.22%

Utah

2.07%

2.32%

4.42%

10.71%

9.56%

*

3.15%

Wyoming

5.10%

5.41%

.

7.57%

*

10.39%

*

4.96%

 
Pacific:
Alaska

4.09%

3.44%

1.06%

*

10.68%

8.45%

3.75%

California

1.23%

1.69%

2.08%

4.13%

*

4.61%

1.29%

Hawaii

1.58%

1.90%

4.71%

*

10.93%

*

2.23%

1.84%

Oregon

2.68%

*

2.57%

*

5.36%

*

5.68%

4.23%

2.83%

*
Washington

3.64%

*

3.72%

*

4.27%

2.83%

*

2.95%

*

3.69%

 
Source: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Center for Financing, Access and Cost Trends. 2005 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey-Insurance Component.
Note: Definitions and descriptions of the methods used for this survey can be found in the Technical Appendix.
* Figure does not meet standard of reliability or precision.
. Data suppressed due to high standard errors or no reported values in cell.
** The definition of low-wage employees changed in 2000. These data are not comparable to IC data prior to 2000. See Technical Appendix for details.