Skip to main content
U.S. flag
Health and Human Services Logo

An official website of the Department of Health & Human Services

menu-iconMore mobile-close-icon
mobile-back-btn-icon Back
  • menu-iconMenu
  • mobile-search-icon
AHRQ: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
  • Search All AHRQ Sites
  • Careers
  • Contact Us
  • Español
  • FAQs
  • Email Updates
MEPS Home Medical Expenditure Panel Survey
Font Size:
Contact MEPS FAQ Site Map  
S
M
L
XL
 

MEPS HC-067A: 2002 Prescribed Medicines
November 2004
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
Center for Financing, Access, and Cost Trends
540 Gaither Road
Rockville, MD 20850
(301) 427-1406


Table of Contents

A. Data Use Agreement
B. Background
1.0 Household Component (HC)
2.0 Medical Provider Component (MPC)
3.0 Insurance Component (IC)
4.0 Survey Management
C. Technical Information
1.0 General Information
2.0 Data File Information
2.1 Using MEPS Data for Trend and Longitudinal Analysis
2.2 Codebook Structure
2.3 Reserved Codes
2.4 Codebook Format
2.5 Variable Naming
2.5.1 General
2.5.2 Expenditure and Sources of Payment Variables
2.6 Data Collection
2.6.1 Methodology for Collecting Household Reported Variables
2.6.2 Methodology for Collecting Pharmacy Reported Variables
2.7 File Contents
2.7.1 Survey Administration Variables
2.7.1.1 Person Identifier Variables (DUID, PID, DUPERSID)
2.7.1.2 Record Identifier Variables (RXRECIDX, LINKIDX)
2.7.1.3 Round Variable (PURCHRD)
2.7.2 Characteristics of Prescribed Medicine Events
2.7.2.1 Date When Prescribed Medicine Was First Taken (RXBEGDD-RXBEGYR)
2.7.2.2 Prescribed Medicine Attributes (RXNAME-RXSTRUNT)
2.7.2.3 Type of Pharmacy (PHARTP1-PHARTP7)
2.7.2.4 Analytic Flag Variables (RXFLG-DIABFLG)
2.7.2.5 The Sample Variable (SAMPLE)
2.7.2.6 Condition Codes (RXICD1X-RXICD3X) and Clinical Classification Codes (RXCCC1X-RXCCC3X)
2.7.3 Multum Lexicon variables from Cerner Multum, Inc
2.7.4 Expenditure Variables (RXSF02X-RXXP02X)
2.7.4.1 Definition of Expenditures
2.7.4.2 Sources of Payment
2.7.5 Sample Weight (PERWT02F)
2.7.5.1 Overview
2.7.5.2 Details on Person Weights Construction
2.7.5.3 MEPS Panel 6 Weight
2.7.5.4 MEPS Panel 7 Weight
2.7.5.5 The Final Weight for 2002
2.7.5.6 Coverage
3.0 General Data Editing and Imputation Methodology
3.1 Rounding
3.2 Edited/Imputed Expenditure Variables (RXSF02X-RXXP02X)
4.0 Strategies for Estimation
4.1 Variables with Missing Values
4.2 Basic Estimates of Utilization, Expenditure and Sources of Payment
4.3 Estimates of the Number of Persons with Prescribed Medicine Events
4.4 Person-Based Ratio Estimates
4.4.1 Person-Based Ratio Estimates Relative to Persons with Prescribed Medicine Events
4.4.2 Person-Based Ratio Estimates Relative to the Entire Population
4.5 Sampling Weights for Merging Previous Releases of MEPS Household Data with this Event File
4.6 Variance Estimation
5.0 Merging/Linking MEPS Data Files
5.1 Linking a Person Level File to the Prescribed Medicines File
5.2 Linking the 2002 Conditions File and/or the Other 2002 MEPS Event Files to the 2002 Prescribed Medicines File
5.3 Limitations/Caveats of RXLK and CLNK
References
D. Variable-Source Crosswalk
Attachment 1
Attachment 2
Attachment 3

A. Data Use Agreement

Individual identifiers have been removed from the microdata contained in these file(s). Nevertheless, under sections 308 (d) and 903 (c) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 242m and 42 U.S.C. 299 a-1), data collected by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) and/or the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) may not be used for any purpose other than for the purpose for which they were supplied; any effort to determine the identity of any reported cases is prohibited by law.

Therefore, in accordance with the above referenced Federal statute, it is understood that:

  1. No one is to use the data in this data set in any way except for statistical reporting and analysis.
  2. If the identity of any person or establishment should be discovered inadvertently, then (a) no use will be made of this knowledge, (b) the Director, Office of Management, AHRQ will be advised of this incident, (c) the information that would identify any individual or establishment will be safeguarded or destroyed, as requested by AHRQ, and (d) no one else will be informed of the discovered identity.
  3. No one will attempt to link this data set with individually identifiable records from any data sets other than the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey or the National Health Interview Survey.

By using these data you signify your agreement to comply with the above-stated statutorily based requirements, with the knowledge that deliberately making a false statement in any matter within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the Federal Government violates Title 18 Part 1 Chapter 47 section 1001 and is punishable by a fine of up to $10,000 or up to 5 years in prison.

The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality requests that users cite AHRQ and the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey as the data source in any publications or research based upon these data.

Return To Table Of Contents

B. Background

This documentation describes one in a series of public use files from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS). The survey provides a new and extensive data set on the use of health services and health care in the United States.

MEPS is conducted to provide nationally representative estimates of health care use, expenditures, sources of payment, and insurance coverage for the U.S. civilian noninstitutionalized population. MEPS is cosponsored by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) and the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS).

MEPS is a family of three surveys. The Household Component (HC) is the core survey and forms the basis for the Medical Provider Component (MPC) and part of the Insurance Component (IC). Together these surveys yield comprehensive data that provide national estimates of the level and distribution of health care use and expenditures, support health services research, and can be used to assess health care policy implications.

MEPS is the third in a series of national probability surveys conducted by AHRQ on the financing and use of medical care in the United States. The National Medical Care Expenditure Survey (NMCES) was conducted in 1977, and the National Medical Expenditure Survey (NMES) was conducted in 1987. Since 1996, MEPS has continued this series with design enhancements and efficiencies that provide a more current data resource to capture the changing dynamics of the health care delivery and insurance system.

The design efficiencies incorporated into MEPS are in accordance with the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) Survey Integration Plan of June 1995, which focused on consolidating DHHS surveys, achieving cost efficiencies, reducing respondent burden, and enhancing analytical capacities. To advance these goals, MEPS includes linkage with the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS)-a survey conducted by NCHS from which the sample for the MEPS HC is drawn and enhanced longitudinal data collection for core survey components. The MEPS HC augments NHIS by selecting a sample of NHIS respondents, collecting additional data on their health care expenditures, and linking these data with additional information collected from the respondents' medical providers, employers, and insurance providers.

Return To Table Of Contents

1.0 Household Component (HC)

The MEPS HC, a nationally representative survey of the U.S. civilian noninstitutionalized population, collects medical expenditure data at both the person and household levels. The HC collects detailed data on demographic characteristics, health conditions, health status, use of medical care services, charges and payments, access to care, satisfaction with care, health insurance coverage, income, and employment.

The HC uses an overlapping panel design in which data are collected through a preliminary contact followed by a series of five rounds of interviews over a 2½ year period. Using computer assisted personal interviewing (CAPI) technology, data on medical expenditures and use for 2 calendar years are collected from each household. This series of data collection rounds is launched each subsequent year on a new sample of households to provide overlapping panels of survey data and, when combined with other ongoing panels, will provide continuous and current estimates of health care expenditures.

The sampling frame for the MEPS HC is drawn from respondents to NHIS. NHIS provides a nationally representative sample of the U.S. civilian noninstitutionalized population, with oversampling of Hispanics and blacks.  

Return To Table Of Contents

2.0 Medical Provider Component (MPC)

The MEPS MPC supplements and/or replaces information on medical care events reported in the MEPS HC by contacting medical providers and pharmacies identified by household respondents. The MPC sample includes all home health agencies and pharmacies reported by HC respondents. Office-based physicians, hospitals, and hospital physicians are also included in the MPC but may be subsampled at various rates, depending on burden and resources, in certain years.

Data are collected on medical and financial characteristics of medical and pharmacy events reported by HC respondents. The MPC is conducted through telephone interviews and record abstraction. 

Return To Table Of Contents

3.0 Insurance Component (IC)

The MEPS IC collects data on health insurance plans obtained through private and public sector employers. Data obtained in the IC include the number and types of private insurance plans offered, benefits associated with these plans, premiums, contributions by employers and employees, and employer characteristics.

Establishments participating in the MEPS IC are selected through three sampling frames:

  • A list of employers or other insurance providers identified by MEPS HC respondents who report having private health insurance at the Round 1 interview.
  • A Bureau of the Census list frame of private sector business establishments.
  • The Census of Governments from the Bureau of the Census.

To provide an integrated picture of health insurance, data collected from the first sampling frame (employers and other insurance providers identified by MEPS HC respondents) are linked back to data provided by those respondents. Data collected from the two Census Bureau sampling frames are used to produce annual national and State estimates of the supply and cost of private health insurance available to American workers and to evaluate policy issues pertaining to health insurance. National estimates of employer contributions to group health insurance from the MEPS IC are used in the computation of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) by the Bureau of Economic Analysis.
The MEPS IC is an annual panel survey. Data are collected from the selected organizations through a prescreening telephone interview, a mailed questionnaire, and a telephone follow-up for nonrespondents. 

Return To Table Of Contents

4.0 Survey Management

MEPS data are collected under the authority of the Public Health Service Act. They are edited and published in accordance with the confidentiality provisions of this act and the Privacy Act. NCHS provides consultation and technical assistance.

As soon as data collection and editing are completed, the MEPS survey data are released to the public in staged releases of summary reports, microdata files, and compendiums of tables. Data are also released through MEPSnet, an online interactive tool developed to give users the ability to statistically analyze MEPS data in real time. Summary reports and compendiums of tables are released as printed documents and electronic files. Microdata files are released on CD ROM and/or as electronic files.

Printed documents and selected public use file data on CD ROMs are available through the AHRQ Publications Clearinghouse. Write or call:

AHRQ Publications Clearinghouse
Attn: (publication number)
P.O. Box 8547
Silver Spring, MD 20907
800 358 9295
410 381 3150 (callers outside the United States only)
888 586 6340 (toll free TDD service; hearing impaired only)

 

Be sure to specify the AHRQ number of the document or CD ROM you are requesting. Selected electronic files are available through the Internet on the MEPS Web site:

http://www.meps.ahrq.gov/

Additional information on MEPS is available from the MEPS project manager or the MEPS public use data manager at the Center for Financing, Access and Cost Trends, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 540 Gaither Road, Rockville, MD 20850 (301/427-1406).

Return To Table Of Contents

C. Technical Information

1.0 General Information

This documentation describes one in a series of public use event files from the 2002 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey Household Component (MEPS HC) and Medical Provider Component (MPC). Released as an ASCII data file and SAS transport file, this public use file provides detailed information on household reported prescribed medicines for a nationally representative sample of the civilian noninstitutionalized population of the United States and can be used to make estimates of prescribed medicine utilization and expenditures for calendar year 2002. As illustrated below, this file consists of MEPS survey data obtained in the 2002 portion of Round 3 and Rounds 4 and 5 for Panel 6, as well as Rounds 1, 2 and the 2002 portion of Round 3 for Panel 7 (i.e., the rounds for the MEPS panels covering calendar year 2002).

301 Moved Permanently

301 Moved Permanently

Each record on this event file represents a unique prescribed medicine event; that is, a prescribed medicine reported as being purchased by the household respondent.  In addition to expenditures related to the prescribed medicine, each record contains household reported characteristics and medical conditions associated with the prescribed medicine. 

Data from this event file can be merged with other 2002 MEPS HC data files, for purposes of appending person characteristics such as demographic or health insurance coverage to each prescribed medicine record. 

Counts of prescribed medicine utilization are based entirely on household reports.  Information from the Pharmacy Component (PC) (within the MEPS Medical Provider Component (MPC), see section B.2.0 for more details on the MPC) was used to provide expenditure and payment data, as well as details of the medication (e.g., strength, quantity, etc.). 

The file can be used to construct summary variables of expenditures, sources of payment, and other aspects of utilization of prescribed medicines.  Aggregate annual person-level information on the use of prescribed medicines and other health services use is provided on the 2002 Full Year Consolidated Data File, where each record represents a MEPS sampled person. 

The following documentation offers a brief overview of the types and levels of data provided and the content and structure of the files and the codebook. It contains the following sections: 

Data File Information
Sample Weight
General Data Editing and Imputation Methods
Strategies for Estimation
Merging/Linking MEPS Data Files
References
Variable to Source Crosswalk 

For more information on MEPS HC survey design see S. Cohen, 1997; J. Cohen, 1997; and S. Cohen, 1996.  For information on the MEPS MPC design, see S. Cohen, 1998.  A copy of the survey instrument used to collect the information on this file is available on the MEPS web site at the following address: <http://www.meps.ahrq.gov>.

Return To Table Of Contents

2.0 Data File Information

This public use data set contains 339,308 prescribed medicine records. Each record represents one household reported prescribed medicine that was purchased during calendar year 2002. Of the 339,308 prescribed medicine records, 332,322 records are associated with persons having a positive person-level weight (PERWT02F). The persons represented on this file had to meet either criterion a or b below:

  1. Be classified as a key inscope person who responded for his or her entire period of 2002 eligibility (i.e., persons with a positive 2002 full-year person-level sampling weight (PERWT02F > 0)), or
  2. Be classified as either an eligible non-key person or an eligible out-of-scope person who responded for his or her entire period of 2002 eligibility, and belonged to a family (i.e., all persons with the same value for a particular FAMID variable) in which all eligible family members responded for their entire period of 2002 eligibility, and at least one family member has a positive 2002 full-year person weight (i.e., eligible non-key or eligible out-of-scope persons who are members of a family, all of whose members have a positive 2002 full-year MEPS family-level weight (FAMWT02F >0)).

Please refer to Attachment 1 for definitions of key, non-key, inscope and eligible. Persons with no prescribed medicine use for 2002 are not included on this file (but are represented on MEPS person-level files). A codebook for the data file is provided (in file H67ACB.PDF).

This file includes prescribed medicine records for all household survey respondents who resided in eligible responding households and reported at least one prescribed medicine. Only prescribed medicines that were purchased in calendar year 2002 are represented on this file. This file includes prescribed medicines identified in the Prescribed Medicines section of the HC survey instrument, as well as those prescribed medicines identified in association with other medical events. Each record on this file represents a single acquisition of a prescribed medicine reported by household respondents. Some household respondents may have multiple acquisitions of prescribed medicines and thus will be represented in multiple records on this file. Other household respondents may have reported no acquisitions of prescribed medicines and thus will have no records on this file.

When diabetic supplies, such as syringes and insulin, were mentioned in the Other Medical Equipment section of the MEPS HC, the interviewer was directed to collect information on these items in the Prescription Medicines section of the MEPS questionnaire. The respondent was also asked the questions in the Charge and Payment section of the HC. To the extent that these items are purchased without a prescription, they represent a non-prescription addition to the MEPS prescription drug expenditure and utilization data. Although these items may be purchased without a prescription, a prescription purchase may be required to obtain third party payments. Analysts are free to code and define diabetic supply/equipment and insulin events utilizing their own coding mechanism. If desired, this would enable analysts to subset the Prescribed Medicines file to exclude these types of events.

It should also be noted that refills are included on this file. The HC obtains information on the name of the prescribed medicine and the number of refills, if any, associated with it. The data collection design for the HC does not allow separate records to be created for multiple acquisitions of the same prescribed medicine. However, in the PC, each original purchase, as well as any refill, is considered a unique prescribed medicine event. Therefore, for the purposes of editing, imputation and analysis, all records in the HC were "unfolded" to create separate records for each original purchase and each refill. Please note, MEPS did not collect information in the HC to distinguish multiple acquisitions of the same drug between the original purchase and refills. The survey only collected data on the number of times a prescribed medicine was acquired during a round. In some cases, all purchases may have been refills of an original purchase in a prior round or prior to the survey year. The file also includes a variable, (SAMPLE), which indicates whether or not the household reported receiving a free sample of that drug in that round. (To obtain more details on free samples, please see section 2.7.2.5.)

Each record on this file includes the following: an identifier for each unique prescribed medicine; detailed characteristics associated with the event (e.g., national drug code (NDC), medicine name, selected Multum Lexicon variables [see section 2.7.3 for more information on the Multum Lexicon variables included on this file], etc.); conditions, if any, associated with the medicine; the date on which the person first used the medicine; total expenditure and sources of payments; types of pharmacies that filled the household's prescriptions; whether the prescription is one in which the household received a free sample of it during the round; and a full-year person-level weight.

Data from this file can be merged with previously released MEPS HC person-level data using the unique person identifier, DUPERSID, to append person characteristics such as demographic or health insurance coverage to each record. Data from this file can also be merged with the 2002 Full Year Consolidated Data File to estimate expenditures for persons with prescribed medicines. The Prescribed Medicines event file can also be linked to the MEPS 2002 Medical Conditions File and additional MEPS 2002 event files. Please see the 2002 Appendix File for details on how to link MEPS data files.

Return To Table Of Contents

2.1 Using MEPS Data for Trend and Longitudinal Analysis

MEPS began in 1996 and several annual data files have been released. As more years of data are produced, MEPS will become increasingly valuable for examining health care trends. However, it is important to consider a variety of factors when examining trends over time using MEPS. Statistical significance tests should be conducted to assess the likelihood that observed trends are attributable to sampling variation. MEPS expenditures estimates are especially sensitive to sampling variation due to the underlying skewed distribution of expenditures. For example, 1 percent of the population accounts for about one-quarter of all expenditures. The extent to which observations with extremely high expenditures are captured in the MEPS sample varies from year to year (especially for smaller population subgroups), which can produce substantial shifts in estimates of means or totals that are simply an artifact of the sample(s). The length of time being analyzed should also be considered. In particular, large shifts in survey estimates over short periods of time (e.g. from one year to the next) that are statistically significant should be interpreted with caution, unless they are attributable to known factors such as changes in public policy or MEPS survey methodology. Looking at changes over longer periods of time can provide a more complete picture of underlying trends. Analysts may wish to consider using techniques to smooth or stabilize trends analyses of MEPS data such as pooling time periods for comparison (e.g. 1996-97 versus 1998-99), working with moving averages, or using modeling techniques with several consecutive years of MEPS data to test the fit of specified patterns over time. Finally, researchers should be aware of the impact of multiple comparisons on Type I error because performing numerous statistical significance tests of trends increases the likelihood of inappropriately concluding a change is statistically significant.

The records on this file can be linked to all other 2002 MEPS-HC public use data sets by the sample person identifier (DUPERSID). Panel 6 cases (PANEL02=6) can be linked back to the 2001 MEPS-HC public use files. However, the user should be aware that, at this time, no weight is provided to facilitate two-year analysis of Panel 6 data.

Return To Table Of Contents

2.2 Codebook Structure

For each variable on the file, both weighted and unweighted frequencies are provided. The codebook and data file sequence list variables in the following order:

Unique person identifiers
Unique prescribed medicine identifiers
Other survey administration variables
Prescribed medicine characteristics variables
ICD-9 codes
Clinical Classification Software codes
Multum Lexicon variables
Expenditure variables
Weight and variance estimation variables
 

Return To Table Of Contents

2.3 Reserved Codes

The following reserved code values are used:

Value Definition
-1   INAPPLICABLE Question was not asked due to skip pattern.
-7   REFUSED Question was asked and respondent refused to answer question.
-8   DK Question was asked and respondent did not know answer.
-9   NOT ASCERTAINED Interviewer did not record the data.
-13   VALUE SUPPRESSED Data suppressed.
-14   NOT YET TAKEN/USED Respondent answered that the medicine has not yet been used.

Generally, values of -1, -7, -8 and -9 have not been edited on this file. However, this is not true if the pharmacist determined a prescription drug name to be a confidentiality risk. In these instances, generally, -9 was replaced for the drug name determined a confidentiality risk. The values of -1 and -9 can be edited by analysts by following the skip patterns in the questionnaire. The value of -13 was assigned when originally reported HC data were suppressed because imputed versions of the variable are available on the Public Use File. The value -14 was a valid value only for the variable representing the year the respondent reported having first used the medicine (RXBEGYRX). RXBEGYRX= -14 means that when the interviewer asked the respondent the year he/she first started using the medicine, he/she responded that he/she had not yet starting using the medicine.

A copy of the Household Component questionnaire can be found on the World Wide Web at http://meps.ahrq.gov/survey_comp/survey.jsp.

Return To Table Of Contents

2.4 Codebook Format

The codebook describes an ASCII data set (although the data are also being provided in a SAS transport file).  The following codebook items are provided for each variable:

Identifier Description
Name

Variable name (maximum of 8 characters)

Description

Variable descriptor (maximum of 40 characters)

Format

Number of bytes

Type

Type of data: numeric (indicated by NUM) or character (indicated by CHAR)

Start

Beginning column position of variable in record

End

Ending column position of variable in record

Return To Table Of Contents

2.5 Variable Naming

In general, variable names reflect the content of the variable, with an 8 character limitation. Generally, imputed/edited variables end with an "X".

Return To Table Of Contents

2.5.1 General

Variables contained on this file were derived from the HC questionnaire itself, the MPC data collection instrument, the CAPI, or from the Multum Lexicon database from Cerner Multum, Inc. The source of each variable is identified in section D, entitled "Variable-Source Crosswalk." Sources for each variable are indicated in one of four ways: (1) variables which are derived from CAPI or assigned in sampling are so indicated; (2) variables which come from one or more specific questions have those numbers and the questionnaire section indicated in the "Source" column; (3) variables constructed from multiple questions using complex algorithms are labeled "Constructed" in the "Source" column; (4) variables which have been imputed are so indicated; and (5) variables derived from the Multum Lexicon database from Cerner Multum, Inc. are so indicated.

Return To Table Of Contents

2.5.2 Expenditure and Sources of Payment Variables

Only imputed/edited versions of the expenditure variables are provided on the file. Expenditure variables on this event file follow a standard naming convention and are 7 characters in length. The 12 source of payment variables and one sum of payments variable are named consistently in the following way:

The first two characters indicate the type of event:

IP - inpatient stay

OB - office-based visit

ER - emergency room visit

OP - outpatient visit

HH - home health visit

DV - dental visit

OM - other medical equipment

RX - prescribed medicine

In the case of the source of payment variables, the third and fourth characters indicate:

SF - self or family OF - other Federal Government XP - sum of payments
MR - Medicare SL - State/local government  
MD - Medicaid WC - Worker's Compensation  
PV - private insurance OT - other insurance  
VA - Veterans OR - other private  
TR - TRICARE OU - other public  

The fifth and sixth characters indicate the year (02). All imputed/edited expenditure variables end with an "X".

For example, RXSF02X is the edited/imputed amount paid by self or family for the 2002 prescribed medicine expenditure. 

Return To Table Of Contents

2.6 Data Collection

Data regarding prescription drugs were obtained through the HC questionnaire and a pharmacy follow-back component (within the Medical Provider Component).

Return To Table Of Contents

2.6.1 Methodology for Collecting Household Reported Variables

During each round of the MEPS HC, all respondents were asked to supply the name of any prescribed medicine they or their family members purchased or otherwise obtained during that round. For each medicine in each round, the following information was collected: whether any free samples of the medicine were received; the name(s) of any health problems the medicine was prescribed for; the number of times the prescription medicine was obtained or purchased; the year, month, and day on which the person first used the medicine; and a list of the names, addresses, and types of pharmacies that filled the household's prescriptions. In the HC, respondents were asked if they send in claim forms for their prescriptions or if their pharmacy providers do this automatically for them at the point of purchase. For those that said their pharmacy providers automatically send in claims for them at the point of purchase, charge and payment information was collected in the pharmacy follow-back component (unless the purchase was an insulin or diabetic supply/equipment event that was mentioned in the household component; see section 3.0 for details). However, charge and payment information was collected for those that said they send in their own prescription claim forms, because it was thought that payments by private third-party payers for those that filed their own claim forms for prescription purchases would not be available from pharmacies. Uninsured persons were treated in the same manner as those whose pharmacies filed their prescription claims at the point of purchase. Persons who said they did not know if they sent in their own prescription claim forms were treated as those who said they did send in their own prescription claim forms.

An inaccuracy in the number of times a household reported purchasing or otherwise obtaining a prescription drug in a particular round for a small percentage of household reported medications was discovered. This inaccuracy was due to an instrument design flaw, which caused interviewer error, and in isolated cases, resulted in misreported large numbers of prescription refills for a medicine in a given round. This inaccuracy was confined to only a very small percentage of unique drugs on the original data delivered. Outlier values where this situation occurred were determined by comparing the number of days a respondent was in the round and the number times the person reported having purchased or otherwise obtained the drug in the round, and were determined in consultation with an industry expert. For these events, a new value for the number of times a drug was purchased or otherwise obtained by a person in a round was imputed. In addition, the prescribed medicine events in which a household respondent did not know/remember the number of times a certain prescribed medicine was purchased or otherwise obtained were imputed a value for that variable.

For those rounds that spanned two years, drugs mentioned in that round were allocated between the years based on the number of times the respondent said the drug was purchased in the respective year, the year the person started taking the drug, the length of the person's round, the dates of the person's round, and the number of drugs for that person in the round. In addition, a "folded" version of the PC on an event level, as opposed to an acquisition level, was used for these types of events to assist in determining how many acquisitions of the drug should be allocated between the years.

Return To Table Of Contents

2.6.2 Methodology for Collecting Pharmacy Reported Variables

If the respondent with the prescription gave written permission to release his or her pharmacy records, pharmacy providers identified by the household were contacted by telephone for the pharmacy follow-back component. Following an initial telephone contact, the signed permission forms and materials explaining the study were faxed (or mailed) to cooperating pharmacy providers. The materials informed the providers of all persons participating in the survey who had prescriptions filled at their place of business and requested a computerized printout of all prescriptions filled for each person. For each medication listed, the following information was requested: date filled; national drug code (NDC); medication name; strength of medicine (amount and unit); quantity (package size/amount dispensed); total charge; and payments by source.

Return To Table Of Contents

2.7 File Contents

2.7.1 Survey Administration Variables

2.7.1.1 Person Identifier Variables (DUID, PID, DUPERSID)

The dwelling unit ID (DUID) is a 5-digit random number assigned after the case was sampled for MEPS. The 3-digit person number (PID) uniquely identifies each person within the dwelling unit. The 8-character variable DUPERSID uniquely identifies each person represented on the file and is the combination of the variables DUID and PID. For detailed information on dwelling units and families, please refer to the documentation for the 2002 Full Year Population Characteristics File.

Return To Table Of Contents

2.7.1.2 Record Identifier Variables (RXRECIDX, LINKIDX)

The variable RXRECIDX uniquely identifies each record on the file. This 15-character variable is comprised of the following components: prescribed medicine event generated through the HC (positions 1-12) + enumeration number (positions 13-15). The prescribed medicine event generated through the HC (positions 1-12) can be used to link a prescribed medicine event to the conditions file and to other event files, via link files, and is provided on this file as the variable LINKIDX. (For more details on linking, please refer to section 5.2 and to the 2002 Appendix File.)

The following hypothetical example illustrates the structure of these ID variables. This example illustrates a person in Round 1 of the household interview who reported having purchased Amoxicillin three times. The following example shows three acquisition-level records, all having the same RXNDC (00093310905), for one person (DUPERSID=00002026) in one round. Only one NDC is associated with a prescribed medicine event because matching was performed at an event level, as opposed to an acquisition level. (For more details on matching, please see section 3.0). The LINKIDX (000020260083) remains the same for all three records, whereas the RXRECIDX (000020260083001, 000020260083002, 000020260083003) differs for all three records.

DUPERSID RXRECIDX LINKIDX RXNDC
00002026 000020260083001 000020260083 00093310905
00002026 000020260083002 000020260083 00093310905
00002026 000020260083003 000020260083 00093310905

Return To Table Of Contents

2.7.1.3. Round Variable (PURCHRD)

The variable PURCHRD indicates the round in which the prescribed medicine was purchased and takes on the value of 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5. Rounds 3, 4, and 5 are associated with MEPS survey data collection from Panel 6. Similarly, Rounds 1, 2, and 3 are associated with data collected from Panel 7.

Return To Table Of Contents

2.7.2 Characteristics of Prescribed Medicine Events

2.7.2.1 Date When Prescribed Medicine Was First Taken (RXBEGDD-RXBEGYRX)

There are three variables which indicate when a prescribed medicine was first taken (used), as reported by the household. They are the following: RXBEGDD indicates the day a person first started taking a medicine, RXBEGMM denotes the month in which a person first started taking a medication, and RXBEGYRX reflects the year in which a person first started taking a medicine. These "first taken" questions are only asked the first time a prescription is mentioned by the household. These questions are not asked of refills of the prescription for a person in subsequent rounds and result in a value of -1 being assigned to those types of events for these variables. For purposes of confidentiality, RXBEGYRX was bottom-coded at 1917 which makes RXBEGYRX consistent with the top-coding of the age variables on the 2002 Full Year Population Characteristics Public Use File (HC-062).

Return To Table Of Contents

2.7.2.2 Prescribed Medicine Attributes (RXNAME-RXSTRUNT)

For each prescribed medicine included on this file, several data items collected describe in detail the medication obtained or purchased. These data items are the following:
 

a. Medication name - pharmacy reported (RXNAME)
b. Medication name - household reported (RXHHNAME)
c. National drug code (RXNDC)
d. Quantity of the prescribed medicine dispensed (RXQUANTY); e.g., number of tablets in the prescription
e. Form of the prescribed medicine (RXFORM); e.g., powder
f. Unit of measurement for form of Rx/prescribed medicine (RXFRMUNT); e.g., oz
g. Strength of the dose of the prescribed medicine (RXSTRENG); e.g., 10
h. Unit of measurement for the strength of the dose of the prescribed medicine (RXSTRUNT); e.g., gm


Please refer to Attachments 1, 2, and 3 for definitions for RXFORM, RXFRMUNT, and RXSTRUNT abbreviations, codes and symbols.

The national drug code (NDC) generally, and on this file, is an 11-digit code. The first 5 digits indicate the manufacturer of the prescribed medicine. The next 4 digits indicate the form and strength of the prescription, and the last 2 digits indicate the package size from which the prescription was dispensed. NDC values were imputed from a proprietary database to certain PC prescriptions because the NDC reported by the pharmacy provider did not match to a proprietary database. These records are identified by RXFLG=3. AHRQ's licensing agreement with the proprietary database precludes the release of these imputed NDC values to the public, so for these prescriptions, the household reported name of the prescription (RXHHNAME) and the original NDC (RXNDC) and prescription name (RXNAME) reported by the pharmacy are provided to allow users to do their own imputation. However, the imputed NDC values for the RXFLG=3 cases may be accessed through the MEPS Data Center. For those events not falling in the RXFLG=3 category, the reserve code (-13) is assigned to the household reported medication name (RXHHNAME). For information on accessing confidential data through the MEPS Data Center, contact the MEPS Project Director by email at: <mepspd@ahrq.gov>.

Imputed data on this event file, unlike other MEPS event files, may still have missing data. This is because imputed data on this file are imputed from the PC or from a proprietary database. These sources did not always include complete information for each variable but did include an NDC, which would typically enable an analyst to obtain any missing data items. For example, although there are a substantial number of missing values for the strength of the prescription that were not supplied by the pharmacist, these missing values were not imputed because this information is embedded in the NDC.

Return To Table Of Contents

2.7.2.3 Type of Pharmacy (PHARTP1-PHARTP7)

Household respondents were asked to list the type of pharmacy from which their medications were purchased. A household could list multiple pharmacies associated with their prescriptions in a given round or over the course of all rounds combined covering the survey year. As a result this file contains, at most, seven of these household reported pharmacies, but there was no link in the survey or in the data file enabling users to know the type of pharmacy from which a specific prescription was obtained if multiple pharmacies are listed. The set of variables (PHARTP1-PHARTP7) identify the types of pharmacy providers from which the person's prescribed medicines were purchased. The possible types of pharmacies include the following: (1) mail-order, (2) another store, (3) HMO/clinic/hospital, (4) drug store, and (5) on-line. A -1 value for PHARTPn indicates that the household did not report an "nth" pharmacy.

Return To Table Of Contents

2.7.2.4 Analytic Flag Variables (RXFLG-DIABFLG)

There are five flag variables included on this file (RXFLG, PCIMPFLG, CLMOMFLG, INPCFLG, and DIABFLG).

The variable RXFLG indicates how the NDC for a specific prescribed medicine event was imputed. This variable indicates whether or not there was any imputation performed on this record for the NDC variable, and if imputed, from what source the NDC was imputed. If no imputation was performed, RXFLG=1. If the imputation source was another PC record, RXFLG=2. Similarly, if the imputation source was a secondary, proprietary database and not the PC database, RXFLG=3. For RXFLG=3 records, all the original data reported by the pharmacy and the household reported medication name are included on the record. Including only the original pharmacy reported data for these records was necessary in order to comply with legal restrictions associated with using the secondary data source as an imputation source. The imputed NDC value for the RXFLG=3 cases was used in the data editing, but is not available for public release. However, the imputed NDCs for the RXFLG=3 cases are available through the MEPS Data Center. Information on this topic can be obtained through the MEPS Project Director at <mepspd@ahrq.gov>.

PCIMPFLG indicates the type of match between a household reported event and a PC reported event. There are only two possible values for this variable (PCIMPFLG =1 or =2). These values indicate the possible "match-types" and are the following: =1 is an exact match for a specific event for a person between the PC and the HC and =2 is not an exact match between the PC and HC for a specific person (not an exact match means that a person's household reported event did not have a matched counterpart in their corresponding PC records). PCIMPFLG assists analysts in determining which records have the strongest link to data reported by a pharmacy. It should be noted that whenever there are multiple purchases of a unique prescribed medication in a given round, MEPS did not collect information that would enable designating any single purchase as the "original" purchase at the time the prescription was first filled, and then designating other purchases as "refills." The user needs to keep this in mind when the purchases of a medication are referred to as "refills" in the documentation. Because matching was performed at an event level as opposed to an acquisition level, the values for PCIMPFLG are either =1 or =2. Additionally, matching on an event- versus acquisition-level results in only one NDC being associated with a prescribed medicine event. (For more details on general data editing/imputation methodology, please see section 3.0).

CLMOMFLG indicates if a prescription medicine event went through the charge and payment section of the HC. Prescription medicine events that went through the charge and payment section of the HC include: (1) events where the person filed their own prescription claim forms with their insurance company, (2) events for persons who responded they did not know if they filed their own prescription claim forms with their insurance company, and (3) insulin and diabetic supply/equipment events (OMTYPE=2 or =3) that were mentioned in the Other Medical section of the HC. For these types of events information on payment sources was retained to the extent that these data were reported by the household in the charge and payment section of the HC.

INPCFLG denotes whether or not a household respondent had at least one prescription drug purchase in the PC (0=no, 1=yes).

When diabetic supplies, such as syringes and insulin, were mentioned in the Other Medical Equipment section of the MEPS HC, the interviewer was directed to collect information on these items in the Prescription Medicines section of the MEPS questionnaire. To the extent that these items are purchased without a prescription, they represent a non-prescription addition to the MEPS prescription drug expenditure and utilization data. Although these items may be purchased without a prescription, a prescription purchase may be required to obtain third party payments. Diabetic supplies can be identified in the file by using the variable, DIABFLG (0=not a diabetic supply/equipment or insulin, 1=is a diabetic supply/equipment or insulin). Diabetic supply/equipment and insulin events were identified with the assistance of an industry expert by utilizing a proprietary database, which assisted in assigning codes to each prescribed medicine event. This code assignment took into account the characteristics of the event. However, if desired, analysts are free to code and define diabetic supply/equipment and insulin events utilizing their own coding mechanism. If desired, DIABFLG can also be used by analysts to exclude diabetic supplies/equipment from their analyses. 

Return To Table Of Contents

2.7.2.5 The Sample Variable (SAMPLE)

SAMPLE indicates if a respondent reported receiving a free sample of the prescription medicine in the round (0=no, 1=yes). Each household respondent was asked in each round whether or not they received any free samples of a reported prescribed medicine during the round. However, respondents were not asked to report the number of free samples received, nor was it made clear that any free samples received were included in the count of the number of times that the respondent reported purchasing or otherwise obtaining the prescribed medicine during the round. Therefore, SAMPLE=1 for all acquisitions that a respondent reported for a person for a specific prescription medicine during the round. This allows individual analysts to determine for themselves how free samples should be handled in their analysis.

Return To Table Of Contents

2.7.2.6 Condition Codes (RXICD1X-RXICD3X) and Clinical Classification Codes (RXCCC1X-RXCCC3X)

Information on household reported medical conditions associated with each prescribed medicine event are provided on this file. There are up to three condition and clinical classification codes listed for each prescribed medicine event (99.7% of prescribed medicine events have 0-3 condition records linked). To obtain complete information associated with an event, the analyst must link to the 2002 Medical Conditions File. Details on how to link to the MEPS 2002 Medical Conditions File are provided in the 2002 Appendix File. The user should note that due to confidentiality restrictions, provider reported condition information (for non-prescription medicines events) is not publicly available. Provider reported condition data (again, for non-prescription medicines events) can be accessed through the MEPS Data Center only.

The medical conditions reported by the HC respondent were recorded by the interviewer as verbatim text, which were then coded to fully-specified 2002 ICD-9-CM codes, including medical condition, V codes, and a small number of E codes, by professional coders. Although codes were verified and error rates did not exceed 2.5 percent for any coder, analysts should not presume this level of precision in the data; the ability of household respondents to report condition data that can be coded accurately should not be assumed. For detailed information on conditions, please refer to the documentation on the 2002 Medical Conditions File. For frequencies of conditions by event type, please see the 2002 Appendix File.

The ICD-9-CM condition codes were aggregated into clinically meaningful categories. These categories, included on the file as RXCCC1X-RXCCC3X, were generated using Clinical Classification Software (CCS) (formerly known as Clinical Classifications for Health Care Policy Research (CCHPR)), which aggregates conditions and V-codes into 260 mutually exclusive categories, most of which are clinically homogeneous.

In order to preserve respondent confidentiality, nearly all of the condition codes provided on this file have been collapsed from fully-specified codes to 3-digit code categories. The reported ICD-9-CM code values were mapped to the appropriate clinical classification category prior to being collapsed to the 3-digit categories.

The condition codes (and clinical classification codes) linked to each prescribed medicine event are sequenced in the order in which the conditions were reported by the household respondent, which was in chronological order of reporting and not in order of importance or severity. Analysts who use the 2002 Medical Conditions file in conjunction with this prescribed medicines event file should note that the conditions on this file are sorted differently than they appear on the Medical Conditions file.

Return To Table Of Contents

2.7.3 Multum Lexicon variables from Cerner Multum, Inc.

Each record on this file contains the following Multum Lexicon variables:

PREGCAT - pregnancy category variable - identifies the FDA pregnancy category to which a particular drug has been assigned

GBO - brand/generic designation variable - designates the product's status as a brand name drug or a generic drug

TCn - therapeutic classification variable - assigns a drug to one or more therapeutic/chemical categories; can have up to three categories per drug

TCnSn - therapeutic sub-classification variable - assigns one or more sub-categories to a more general therapeutic class category given to a drug

TCnSn_n - therapeutic sub sub-classification variable - assigns one or more sub sub-categories to a more general therapeutic class category and sub-category given to a drug

For additional information on these and other Multum Lexicon variables, as well as the Multum Lexicon database itself, please refer to the following web site: http://www.multum.com/Lexicon.htm

Researchers using the Multum Lexicon variables are requested to cite Multum Lexicon as the data source.

2.7.4 Expenditure Variables (RXSF02X-RXXP02X)

2.7.4.1 Definition of Expenditures

Expenditures on this file refer to what is paid for health care services. More specifically, expenditures in MEPS are defined as the sum of payments for care received, including out of pocket payments and payments made by private insurance, Medicaid, Medicare and other sources. The definition of expenditures used in MEPS differs slightly from its predecessors, the 1987 NMES and 1977 NMCES surveys, where "charges" rather than "sum of payments" were used to measure expenditures. This change was adopted because charges became a less appropriate proxy for medical expenditures during the 1990's due to the increasingly common practice of discounting charges. Although measuring expenditures as the sum of payments incorporates discounts in the MEPS expenditure estimates, the estimates do not incorporate any manufacturer or other rebates associated with Medicaid or other purchases. Another general change from the two prior surveys is that charges associated with uncollected liability, bad debt, and charitable care (unless provided by a public clinic or hospital) are not counted as expenditures, because there are no payments associated with those classifications. For details on expenditure definitions, please reference the following, "Informing American Health Care Policy" (Monheit, Wilson, Arnett, 1999).

If examining trends in MEPS expenditures or performing longitudinal analysis on MEPS expenditures, please refer to section C, sub-section 2.1 for more information. 

Return To Table Of Contents

2.7.4.2 Sources of Payment

In addition to total expenditures, variables are provided which itemize expenditures according to major source of payment categories. These categories are:

1. Out of pocket by user or  family
2. Medicare
3. Medicaid
4. Private Insurance
5. Veteran's Administration
6. TRICARE
7. Other Federal sources - includes Indian Health Service, Military Treatment Facilities, and other care by the Federal government
8. Other State and Local Source - includes community and neighborhood clinics, State and local health departments, and State programs other than Medicaid
9. Worker's Compensation
10. Other Unclassified Sources - includes sources such as automobile, homeowner's, liability, and other miscellaneous or unknown sources

Two additional source of payment variables were created to classify payments for particular persons that appear inconsistent due to differences between survey questions on health insurance coverage and sources of payment for medical events. These variables include:
 

11. Other Private - any type of private insurance payments reported for persons not reported to have any private health insurance coverage during the year as defined in MEPS; and
12. Other Public - Medicaid payments reported for persons who were not reported to be enrolled in the Medicaid program at any time during the year


Though relatively small in magnitude, users should exercise caution when interpreting the expenditures associated with these two additional sources of payment. While these payments stem from apparent inconsistent responses to health insurance and source of payment questions in the survey, some of these inconsistencies may have logical explanations. For example, private insurance coverage in MEPS is defined as having a major medical plan covering hospital and physician services. If a MEPS sampled person did not have such coverage but had a single service type insurance plan (e.g. dental insurance) that paid for a particular episode of care, those payments may be classified as "other private". Some of the "other public" payments may stem from confusion between Medicaid and other state and local programs or may be from persons who were not enrolled in Medicaid, but were presumed eligible by a provider who ultimately received payments from the program. 

Return To Table Of Contents

2.7.5 Sample Weight (PERWT02F)

2.7.5.1 Overview

There is a single full year person-level weight (PERWT02F) assigned to each record for each key, in-scope person who responded to MEPS for the full period of time that he or she was in-scope during 2002. A key person either was a member of an NHIS household at the time of the NHIS interview, or became a member of such a household after being out-of-scope at the time of the NHIS (examples of the latter situation include newborns and persons returning from military service, an institution, or living outside the United States). A person is in-scope whenever he or she is a member of the civilian noninstitutionalized portion of the U.S. population.

Return To Table Of Contents

2.7.5.2 Details on Person Weights Construction

The person-level weight PERWT02F was developed in several stages. Person-level weights for Panels 6 and 7 were created separately. The weighting process for each panel included an adjustment for nonresponse over time and poststratification. Poststratification was achieved by controlling to Current Population Survey (CPS) population estimates based on five variables. Variables used in the establishment of person-level poststratification control figures included: census region (Northeast, Midwest, South, West); MSA status (MSA, non-MSA); race/ethnicity (Hispanic, black but non-Hispanic, and other); sex; and age. A 2002 composite weight was then formed by multiplying each panel weight by .5 and then poststratifying the resulting weight to the same set of CPS-based control totals. When poverty status information derived from income variables became available, a final poststratification was done on the resulting weight variable, including poverty status (below poverty, from 100 to 125 percent of poverty, from 125 to 200 percent of poverty, from 200 to 400 percent of poverty, at least 400 percent of poverty) as well as the original five poststratification variables in the establishment of control totals.

Return To Table Of Contents

2.7.5.3 MEPS Panel 6 Weight

The person-level weight for MEPS Panel 6 was developed using the 2001 full year weight for an individual as a "base" weight for survey participants present in 2001. For key, in-scope respondents who joined an RU some time in 2002 after being out-of-scope in 2001, the 2001 family weight associated with the family the person joined served as a "base" weight. The weighting process included an adjustment for nonresponse over Rounds 4 and 5 as well as poststratification to population control figures for December 2002. These control figures were derived by scaling back the population totals obtained from the March 2002 CPS to reflect the December 2002 CPS estimated population distribution across age and sex categories as of December 2002. Variables used in the establishment of person-level poststratification control figures included: census region (Northeast, Midwest, South, West); MSA status (MSA, non-MSA); race/ethnicity (Hispanic, black but non-Hispanic, and other); sex; and age. Overall, the weighted population estimate for the civilian noninstitutionalized population on December 31, 2002 is 284,568,843. Key, responding persons not in-scope on December 31, 2002 but in-scope earlier in the year retained, as their final Panel 6 weight, the weight after the nonresponse adjustment.

Return To Table Of Contents

2.7.5.4 MEPS Panel 7 Weight

The person-level weight for MEPS Panel 7 was developed using the MEPS Round 1 person-level weight as a "base" weight. For key, in-scope respondents who joined an RU after Round 1, the Round 1 family weight served as a "base" weight. The weighting process included an adjustment for nonresponse over Round 2 and the 2002 portion of Round 3 as well as poststratification to the same population control figures for December 2002 used for the MEPS Panel 6 weights. The same five variables employed for Panel 6 poststratification (census region, MSA status, race/ethnicity, sex, and age) were used for Panel 7 poststratification. Similarly, for Panel 7, key, responding persons not in-scope on December 31, 2002 but in-scope earlier in the year retained, as their final Panel 7 weight, the weight after the nonresponse adjustment.

Note that the MEPS Round 1 weights (for both panels with one exception as noted below) incorporated the following components: the original household probability of selection for the NHIS; ratio-adjustment to NHIS-based national population estimates at the household (occupied dwelling unit) level; adjustment for nonresponse at the dwelling unit level for Round 1; and poststratification to figures at the family and person level obtained from the March 2002 CPS data base.

Return To Table Of Contents

2.7.5.5 The Final Weight for 2002

Variables used in the establishment of person-level poststratification control figures included: poverty status (below poverty, from 100 to 125 percent of poverty, from 125 to 200 percent of poverty, from 200 to 400 percent of poverty, at least 400 percent of poverty); census region (Northeast, Midwest, South, West); MSA status (MSA, non-MSA); race/ethnicity (Hispanic, black but non-Hispanic, and other); sex; and age. Overall, the weighted population estimate for the civilian noninstitutionalized population for December 31, 2002 is 284,568,843 (PERWT02F>0 and INSC1231=1). The weights of some persons out-of-scope on December 31, 2002 were also poststratified. Specifically, the weights of persons out-of-scope on December 31, 2002 who were in-scope some time during the year and also entered a nursing home during the year were poststratified to a corresponding control total obtained from the 1996 MEPS Nursing Home Component. The weights of persons who died while in-scope during 2002 were poststratified to corresponding estimates derived using data obtained from the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey (MCBS) and Vital Statistics information provided by the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS). Separate control totals were developed for the "65 and older" and "under 65" civilian noninstitutionalized populations.

Return To Table Of Contents

2.7.5.6 Coverage

The target population for MEPS in this file is the 2002 U.S. civilian noninstitutionalized population. However, the MEPS sampled households are a subsample of the NHIS households interviewed in 2000 (Panel 6) and 2001 (Panel 7). New households created after the NHIS interviews for the respective Panels and consisting exclusively of persons who entered the target population after 2000 (Panel 6) or after 2001 (Panel 7) are not covered by MEPS. Neither are previously out-of-scope persons who join an existing household but are unrelated to the current household residents. Persons not covered by a given MEPS panel thus include some members of the following groups: immigrants; persons leaving the military; U.S. citizens returning from residence in another country; and persons leaving institutions. The set of uncovered persons constitutes only a small segment of the MEPS target population.

Return To Table Of Contents

3.0 General Data Editing and Imputation Methodology

The general approach to preparing the household prescription data for this file was to utilize the PC prescription data to impute information collected from pharmacy providers to the household drug mentions. For events that went through the charge and payment section of the HC (events where the person filed their own prescription claim forms with their insurance company, events for persons who responded they did not know if they filed their own prescription claim forms with their insurance company, and insulin and diabetic supply/equipment events (OMTYPE=2 or =3) that were mentioned in the Other Medical section of the HC), information on payment sources was retained to the extent that these data were reported by the household in the charge and payment section of the HC. A matching program was adopted to link PC drugs and the corresponding drug information to household drug mentions. To improve the quality of these matches, all drugs on the household and pharmacy files were coded using a proprietary database on the basis of the medication names provided by the household and pharmacy, and, when available, the NDC provided in the pharmacy follow-back component. The matching process was done at an event level, as opposed to an acquisition level. Considerable editing was done prior to the matching to correct data inconsistencies in both data sets and to fill in missing data and correct outliers on the pharmacy file.

Drug price-per-unit outliers were analyzed on the pharmacy file by first identifying the average wholesale unit price (AWUP) of the drug by linkage through the NDC to a secondary data file. In general, prescription drug unit prices were deemed to be outliers by comparing unit prices reported in the pharmacy database to the AWUP reported in the secondary data file and were edited, as necessary. Outlier thresholds were established in consultation with industry experts.

Drug matches between household drug mentions and pharmacy drug events for a person in the PC were based on drug code, medication name, and the round in which the drug was reported. The matching of household drug mentions to pharmacy drugs was performed so that the most detailed and accurate information for each prescribed medicine event was obtained. Exact dates of purchase were only available from the follow-back component. The matching program assigned scores to potential matches. Numeric variables required exact matches to receive a high score, while partial scores could be assigned to matches between character variables, such as prescription name, depending on the degree of similarity in the spelling and sound of the medication names. Household drug mentions that were deemed exact matches to PC drugs for the same person in the same round required sufficiently high scores to reflect a high quality match. Exact matches were used only once and were taken out of the donor pool from that point on (i.e., these matches were made without replacement). Any refill of a household drug mention that had been matched to a pharmacy drug event was also matched to the same pharmacy drug event. All remaining unmatched household drug mentions for persons either in or out of the PC were statistically matched to the entire pharmacy donor base with replacement by medication name, drug code, type of third party coverage, health conditions, age, sex, and other characteristics of the individual. Potential PC donor records were omitted from these matches whenever a NDC was imputed to the PC record and was not an exact match on a generic product code applied to all records in the HC and PC.

For more information on the MEPS Prescribed Medicines editing and imputation procedures, please see J. Moeller, 2001.

Return To Table Of Contents

3.1 Rounding

Expenditure variables on the 2002 Prescribed Medicines file have been rounded to the nearest penny. Person-level expenditure variables released on the 2002 Full Year Consolidated Data File were rounded to the nearest dollar. It should be noted that using the 2002 MEPS event files to create person-level totals will yield slightly different totals than those found on the 2002 Full Year Consolidated Data File. These differences are due to rounding only. Moreover, in some instances, the number of persons having expenditures on the 2002 event files for a particular source of payment may differ from the number of persons with expenditures on the 2002 Full Year Consolidated Data File for that source of payment. This difference is also an artifact of rounding only. Please see the 2002 Appendix File for details on such rounding differences.

Return To Table Of Contents

3.2 Edited/Imputed Expenditure Variables (RXSF02X-RXXP02X)

There are 13 expenditure variables included on this event file. All of these expenditures have gone through an editing and imputation process and have been rounded to the second decimal place. There is a sum of payments variable (RXXP02X) which for each prescribed medicine event sums all the expenditures from the various sources of payment. The 12 sources of payment expenditure variables for each prescribed medicine event are the following: amount paid by self or family (RXSF02X), amount paid by Medicare (RXMR02X), amount paid by Medicaid (RXMD02X), amount paid by private insurance (RXPV02X), amount paid by the Veterans Administration (RXVA02X), amount paid by TRICARE (RXTR02X), amount paid by other federal sources (RXOF02X), amount paid by state and local (non-federal) government sources (RXSL02X), amount paid by Worker's Compensation (RXWC02X), and amount paid by some other source of insurance (RXOT02X). As mentioned previously, there are two additional expenditure variables called RXOR02X and RXOU02X (other private and other public, respectively). These two expenditure variables were created to maintain consistency between what the household reported as their private and public insurance status for hospitalization and physician coverage and third party prescription payments from other private and public sources (such as a separate private prescription policy or prescription coverage from the Veterans Administration, the Indian Health Service, or a State assistance program other than Medicaid). Users should exercise caution when interpreting the expenditures associated with these two additional sources of payment. While these payments stem from apparent inconsistent responses to health insurance and source of payment questions in the survey, some of these inconsistencies may have logical explanations. Please see section 2.7.4 for details on these and all other source of payment variables.

Return To Table Of Contents

4.0 Strategies for Estimation

This file is constructed for efficient estimation of utilization, expenditure, and sources of payment for outpatient care and to allow for estimates of number of persons with prescribed medicine purchases during 2002.

Return To Table Of Contents

4.1 Variables with Missing Values

It is essential that the analyst examine all variables for the presence of negative values used to represent missing values. For continuous or discrete variables, where means or totals may be taken, it may be necessary to set minus values to values appropriate to the analytic needs. That is, the analyst should either impute a value or set the value to one that will be interpreted as missing by the computing language used. For categorical and dichotomous variables, the analyst may want to consider whether to recode or impute a value for cases with negative values or whether to exclude or include such cases in the numerator and/or denominator when calculating proportions.

Methodologies used for the editing/imputation of expenditure variables are described in Section 3.0. 

Return To Table Of Contents

4.2 Basic Estimates of Utilization, Expenditures, and Sources of Payment

While the examples described below illustrate the use of event-level data in constructing person-level total expenditures, these estimates can also be derived from the person-level expenditure file unless the characteristic of interest is event specific.

In order to produce national estimates related to prescribed medicines utilization, expenditure and sources of payment, the value in each record contributing to the estimates must be multiplied by the weight (PERWT02F) contained on that record.

Example 1

For example, the total number of prescribed medicines events for the civilian non-institutionalized population of the U.S. in 2002 is estimated as the sum of the weight (PERWT02F) across all prescribed medicines event records. That is,
 

301 Moved Permanently

301 Moved Permanently

= 2,692,969,879 for all records (1)

_____________________
1 In this and all other examples, unless otherwise noted, prescribed medicines records include diabetic supplies\equipment and insulin.

 

Example 2

Subsetting to records based on characteristics of interest expands the scope of potential estimates. For example, the estimate for the mean out-of-pocket payment per prescription medicine purchase should be calculated as the weighted mean of amount paid by self/family. That is,
 

301 Moved Permanently

301 Moved Permanently

= $23.67 (2)

where

301 Moved Permanently

301 Moved Permanently

= 2,692,969,879 and Xj = RXSF02Xj

This gives $23.67 as the estimated mean amount of out-of-pocket payment of expenditures associated with prescribed medicines events and 2,692,969,879 as an estimate of the total number of prescription medicine purchases. Both of these estimates are for the civilian non-institutionalized population of the U.S. in 2002.
 

Example 3

Another example would be to estimate the average proportion of total expenditures paid by private insurance per prescription medicine purchase. This should be calculated as the weighted mean of the proportion of the total prescription medicine purchase paid by private insurance at the prescribed medicines event level. That is,

301 Moved Permanently

301 Moved Permanently

= 0.2753 (3)

where

301 Moved Permanently

301 Moved Permanently

= 2,692,969,879 and Yj = RXPV02Xj / RXXP02Xj


This gives 0.2753 as the estimated mean proportion of total expenditures paid by private insurance per prescription medicine purchase for the civilian non-institutionalized population of the U.S. in 2002.

Return To Table Of Contents

4.3 Estimates of the Number of Persons with Prescribed Medicine Events

When calculating an estimate of the total number of persons with prescribed medicine events, users can use a person-level file or this event file. However, this event file must be used when the measure of interest is defined at the event level. For example, to estimate the number of persons in the civilian non-institutionalized population of the U.S. with a prescribed medicine purchase in 2002 with an RXNDC = "00093310905" (Amoxicillin), this event file must be used. This would be estimated as

301 Moved Permanently

301 Moved Permanently

across all unique persons i on this file (4)

where

Wi is the sampling weight (PERWT02F) for person i

and

Xi = 1 if RXNDC = '00093310905" for any purchase of person i.
     = 0 otherwise

Return To Table Of Contents

4.4 Person-Based Ratio Estimates

4.4.1 Person-Based Ratio Estimates Relative to Persons with Prescribed Medicine Events

This file may be used to derive person-based ratio estimates. However, when calculating ratio estimates where the denominator is persons, care should be taken to properly define and estimate the unit of analysis up to person level. For example, the mean expense for persons with prescribed medicine purchases is estimated as,

301 Moved Permanently

301 Moved Permanently

across all unique persons i on this file (5)

where

Wi is the sampling weight (PERWT02F) for person i

and

Zi = 301 Moved Permanently

301 Moved Permanently

 RXXP02Xj across all prescription purchases for person i.

 

Return To Table Of Contents

4.4.2 Person-Based Ratio Estimates Relative to the Entire Population

If the ratio relates to the entire population, this file cannot be used to calculate the denominator, as only those persons with at least one prescribed medicine event are represented on this data file. In this case the person-level file, which has data for all sampled persons, must be used to estimate the total number of persons (i.e. those with use and those without use). For example, to estimate the proportion of civilian non-institutionalized population of the U.S. with at least one prescribed medicine event with RXNDC = "00093310905" (Amoxicillin) in 2002, the numerator would be derived from data on this event file, and the denominator would be derived from data on the person-level file. That is,

301 Moved Permanently

301 Moved Permanently

across all unique persons i on the MEPS HC-062 file (6)

where

Wiis the sampling weight (PERWT02F) for person i

and

Zi = 1 if RXNDCj = "00093310905" for any event of person i.
    = 0 otherwise.

Return To Table Of Contents

4.5 Sampling Weights for Merging Previous Releases of MEPS Household Data with this Event File

There have been several previous releases of MEPS Household Survey public use data. Unless a variable name common to several files is provided, the sampling weights contained on these data files are file-specific. The file-specific weights reflect minor adjustments to eligibility and response indicators due to birth, death, or institutionalization among respondents.

For estimates from a MEPS data file that do not require merging with variables from other MEPS data files, the sampling weight(s) provided on that data file are the appropriate weight(s). When merging a MEPS Household data file to another, the major analytical variable (i.e. the dependent variable) determines the correct sampling weight to use. 

Return To Table Of Contents

4.6 Variance Estimation

To obtain estimates of variability (such as the standard error of sample estimates or corresponding confidence intervals) for estimates based on MEPS survey data, one needs to take into account the complex sample design of MEPS. Various approaches can be used to develop such estimates of variance including use of the Taylor series or various replication methodologies. Replicate weights have not been developed for the MEPS 2002 data. Variables needed to implement a Taylor series estimation approach are provided in the file and are described in the paragraph below.
Using a Taylor Series approach, variance estimation strata and the variance estimation PSUs within these strata must be specified. The corresponding variables on the MEPS full year utilization database are VARSTR and VARPSU, respectively. Specifying a "with replacement" design in a computer software package such as SUDAAN (Shah, 1996) should provide standard errors appropriate for assessing the variability of MEPS survey estimates. It should be noted that the number of degrees of freedom associated with estimates of variability indicated by such a package may not appropriately reflect the actual number available. For MEPS sample estimates for characteristics generally distributed throughout the country (and thus the sample PSUs), there are over 100 degrees of freedom associated with the corresponding estimates of variance. The following illustrates these concepts using two examples from section 4.2.

Examples 2 and 3 from Section 4.2

Using a Taylor Series approach, specifying VARSTR and VARPSU as the variance estimation strata and PSUs (within these strata) respectively and specifying a "with replacement" design in a computer software package SUDAAN will yield standard error estimates of $0.3303 and 0.0057 for the estimated mean of out-of-pocket payment and the estimated mean proportion of total expenditures paid by private insurance respectively.

Return To Table Of Contents

5.0 Merging/Linking MEPS Data Files

Data from this event file can be used alone or in conjunction with other files. This section provides instructions for linking the 2002 prescribed medicines file with other 2002 MEPS public use files, including a 2002 person-level file, the 2002 conditions file, and the other 2002 event files.

Return To Table Of Contents

5.1 Linking a Person Level File to the Prescribed Medicines File

Merging characteristics of interest from other 2002 MEPS files (e.g., the 2002 Full Year Consolidated File or the 2002 Office Based Provider File) expands the scope of potential estimates. For example, to estimate the total number of prescribed medicines purchased or otherwise obtained by persons with specific characteristics (e.g., age, race, and sex), population characteristics from a person-level file need to be merged onto the prescribed medicines file. This procedure is illustrated below. The 2002 Appendix File provides additional details on how to merge 2002 MEPS data files.

1. Create data set PERSX by sorting a Full Year Population Characteristics File (file HCXXX), by the person identifier, DUPERSID. Keep only variables to be merged on to the prescribed medicines file and DUPERSID.
2. Create data set PMEDS by sorting the prescribed medicines file by person identifier, DUPERSID.
3. Create final data set NEWPMEDS by merging these two files by DUPERSID, keeping only records on the prescribed medicines file.

The following is an example of SAS code, which completes these steps:

PROC SORT DATA=HCXXX(KEEP=DUPERSID AGE31X SEX RACEX) OUT=PERSX;
  BY DUPERSID;
RUN;  
PROC SORT DATA= HC067A OUT=PMEDS;
  BY DUPERSID;
RUN;  
DATA NEWPMEDS;
  MERGE PMEDS (IN=A) PERSX(IN=B);
  BY DUPERSID;
  IF A;
RUN;  

Return To Table Of Contents

5.2 Linking the 2002 Conditions File and/or the Other 2002 MEPS Event Files to the 2002 Prescribed Medicines File

Due to survey design issues, there are limitations/caveats that an analyst must keep in mind when linking the different files. Those limitations/caveats are listed below. For detailed linking examples, including SAS code, analysts should refer to the 2002 Appendix File.

Return To Table Of Contents

5.3 Limitations/Caveats of RXLK and CLNK

The RXLK file provides a link between the 2002 prescribed medicine records and the other 2002 MEPS event files. When using RXLK, analysts should keep in mind that a prescribed medicine event may link to more than one medical event. When this occurs, it is up to the analyst to determine how the prescribed medicine expenditures should be allocated among those events. In order to obtain complete information about those other event files, the analyst must link to the other public use event files.

The CLNK provides a link between the 2002 Medical Conditions File and the 2002 Prescribed Medicines file. When using the CLNK, analysts should keep in mind that (1) conditions are self reported and (2) there may be multiple conditions associated with a drug purchase. Analysts need to verify that a particular medication is indeed an appropriate medication in treating the condition. Moreover, there may be some drugs that were purchased to treat a specific health condition for which there is no such link to the condition file because the respondent did not report the condition as being related to the prescribed medicine. 

Return To Table Of Contents

References

Cohen, S.B. (1998). Sample Design of the 1996 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey Medical Provider Component. Journal of Economic and Social Measurement. Vol 24, 25-53.

Cohen, S.B. (1997). Sample Design of the 1996 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey Household Component. Rockville (MD): Agency for Health Care Policy and Research; 1997. MEPS Methodology Report, No. 2. AHCPR Pub. No. 97-0027.

Cohen, J.W. (1997). Design and Methods of the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey Household Component. Rockville (MD): Agency for Health Care Policy and Research; 1997. MEPS Methodology Report, No. 1. AHCPR Pub. No. 97-0026.

Cohen, S.B. (1996). The Redesign of the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey: A Component of the DHHS Survey Integration Plan. Proceedings of the COPAFS Seminar on Statistical Methodology in the Public Service.

Cox, B.G. and Cohen, S.B. (1985). Chapter 8: Imputation Procedures to Compensate for Missing Responses to Data Items. In Methodological Issues for Health Care Surveys. Marcel Dekker, New York.

Moeller J.F., Stagnitti, M., Horan, E., et al. Outpatient Prescription Drugs: Data Collection and Editing in the 1996 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (HC-010A). Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2001. MEPS Methodology Report No. 12. AHRQ Pub. No. 01-0002.

Monheit, A.C., Wilson, R., and Arnett, III, R.H. (Editors). Informing American Health Care Policy. (1999). Jossey-Bass Inc, San Francisco.

Shah, B.V., Barnwell, B.G., Bieler, G.S., Boyle, K.E., Folsom, R.E., Lavange, L., Wheeless, S.C., and Williams, R. (1996). Technical Manual: Statistical Methods and Algorithms Used in SUDAAN Release 7.0, Research Triangle Park, NC: Research Triangle Institute.  

Return To Table Of Contents

D. Variable-Source Crosswalk

MEPS HC-067A: 2002 Prescribed Medicines Events

Survey Administration Variables

Variable

Description

Source

DUID
Dwelling unit ID
Assigned in sampling
PID
Person number
Assigned in sampling
DUPERSID
Sample person ID (DUID + PID)
Assigned in sampling
RXRECIDX
Record ID - Unique Prescribed Medicine Identifier
Constructed
LINKIDX
Link to condition and other event files
CAPI derived
PURCHRD
Round in which the Rx/prescribed medicine was obtained/purchased
CAPI derived

Return To Table Of Contents

Prescribed Medicines Events Variables

Variable

Description

Source

RXBEGDD
Day person first used medicine
PM11OV1
RXBEGMM
Month person first used medicine
PM11OV2
RXBEGYR
Year person first used medicine
PM11
RXNAME
Medication name (Imputed)
Imputed
RXHHNAME
Household reported medication name
PM05
RXNDC
National drug code (Imputed)
Imputed
RXQUANTY
Quantity of Rx/prescribed medicine (Imputed)
Imputed
RXFORM
Form of Rx/prescribed medicine (Imputed)
Imputed
RXFRMUNT
Unit of measurement for form of Rx/prescribed medicine (Imputed)
Imputed
RXSTRENG
Strength of Rx/prescribed medicine dose (Imputed)
Imputed
RXSTRUNT
Unit of measurement for strength of Rx/prescribed medicine dose (Imputed)
Imputed
PHARTP1-PHARTP7
Type of pharmacy provider - (1st-7th)
PM16
RXFLG
Flag variable indicating imputation source for NDC on pharmacy donor record
Constructed
PCIMPFLG
Flag indicating type of household to pharmacy prescription match
Constructed
CLMOMFLG
Charge/payment, Rx claim filing, and OMTYPE =2 or =3 (insulin and diabetic supply equipment events) status
CP01/Constructed
INPCFLG
Flag indicating if the person has at least one record in the pharmacy component
Constructed
DIABFLG
Flag indicating whether or not prescribed medicine was classified as insulin or diabetic supply/equipment
Constructed
SAMPLE
Flag indicating if a respondent received a free sample of this drug in the round
CAPI derived
RXICD1X
3 digit ICD-9 condition code
PM09
RXICD2X
3 digit ICD-9 condition code
PM09
RXICD3X
3 digit ICD-9 condition code
PM09
RXCCC1X
Modified Clinical Classification Code
Constructed/Edited
RXCCC2X
Modified Clinical Classification Code
Constructed/Edited
RXCCC3X
Modified Clinical Classification Code
Constructed/Edited
PREGCAT
Multum Pregnancy Category
Cerner Multum, Inc.
GBO
Multum Brand/Generic Designation
Cerner Multum, Inc.
TC1
Multum Therapeutic Class #1
Cerner Multum, Inc.
TC1S1
Multum Therapeutic Sub-Class #1 for TC1
Cerner Multum, Inc.
TC1S1_1
Multum Therapeutic Sub-Sub-Class for TC1S1
Cerner Multum, Inc.
TC1S1_2
Multum Therapeutic Sub-Sub-Class for TC1S1
Cerner Multum, Inc.
TC1S2
Multum Therapeutic Sub-Class #2 for TC1
Cerner Multum, Inc.
TC1S2_1
Multum Therapeutic Sub-Sub-Class for TC1S2
Cerner Multum, Inc.
TC2
Multum Therapeutic Class #2
Cerner Multum, Inc.
TC2S1
Multum Multum Therapeutic Sub-Class #1 for TC2
Cerner Multum, Inc.
TC2S1_1
Multum Therapeutic Sub-Sub-Class for TC2S1
Cerner Multum, Inc.
TC2S1_2
Multum Therapeutic Sub-Sub-Class for TC2S1
Cerner Multum, Inc.
TC2S2
Multum Therapeutic Sub-Class #2 for TC2
Cerner Multum, Inc.
TC3
Multum Therapeutic Class #3
Cerner Multum, Inc.
TC3S1
Multum Therapeutic Sub-Class #1 for TC3
Cerner Multum, Inc.
TC3S1_1
Multum Therapeutic Sub-Sub-Class for TC3S1
Cerner Multum, Inc.
RXSF02X
Amount paid, self or family (Imputed)
CP11/Edited/Imputed
RXMR02X
Amount paid, Medicare (Imputed)
CP12/CP13/Edited/Imputed
RXMD02X
Amount paid, Medicaid (Imputed)
CP12/CP13/Edited/Imputed
RXPV02X
Amount paid, private insurance (Imputed)
CP12/CP13/Edited/Imputed
RXVA02X
Amount paid, Veteran's Administration (Imputed)
CP12/CP13/Edited/Imputed
RXTR02X
Amount paid, TRICARE (Imputed)
CP12/CP13/Edited/Imputed
RXOF02X
Amount paid, other Federal (Imputed)
CP12/CP13/Edited/Imputed
RXSL02X
Amount paid, state and local government (Imputed)
CP12/CP13/Edited/Imputed
RXWC02X
Amount paid, Worker's Compensation (Imputed)
CP12/CP13/Edited/Imputed
RXOT02X
Amount paid, other insurance (Imputed)
CP12/CP13/Edited/Imputed
RXOR02X
Amount paid, other private (Imputed)
Constructed/Imputed
RXOU02X
Amount paid, other public (Imputed)
Constructed/Imputed
RXXP02X
Sum of payments RXSF01X - RXOU01X (Imputed)
CP12/CP13/Edited/Imputed

Return To Table Of Contents

 

Weights

Variable

Description

Source

PERWT02F
Poverty/mortality/nursing home adjusted person level weight
Constructed
VARSTR
Variance estimation stratum, 2002
Constructed
VARPSU
Variance estimation PSU, 2002
Constructed

Return To Table Of Contents

Attachment 1

Definitions of Abbreviations for RXFORM

Dosage Form

Definition

-7
refused
-8
don't know
-9
not ascertained
ACC
accessory
ADR
acetic acid drop
AE
aerosol
AER
aerosol
AERO
aerosol
AEROSOL
AMP
ampule
ARO
aerosol solid
AUTO INJ
auto-injection
BACK SUPPORT BELT
BAG
BAN
bandage
BANDAGE
BATTERY
BOT
bottle
BOTTLE
BOX
BOXES
BUT
butterfly
C
capsules , or cream (varies)
C12
12 hour extended-release
capsule
C24
24 hour extended-release
capsule
CA
capsule
CANE
CAP
capsule
CAP DR
delayed-release capsule
CAP ER
extended-release capsule
CAP SA
slow-acting capsule
CAPLET
CAPLT
caplet
CAPS
capsules
CAPSULE
CAPSULE SA
slow-acting capsule
CC
cubic centimeter
CER
extended-release capsule
CHEW
chewable tablet
CHEW TAB
chewable tablet
CHEW TABS
chewable tablets
CHEWABLE
CHW
chewable tablets
COMBO
COMPOUND
CON
condom
CONDOM
CPSR
slow-release capsule
CR
cream
CRE
cream
CREA
cream
CREAM
CRM
cream
CTB
chewable tablets
CTG
cartridge
CUTTER
DEV
device
DEVICE
DIA
diaper
DIAPER
DIS
disk
DISK
DOS PAK
dose pack
DR
drop
DRE
dressing
DRESSING
DROP
DROPS
DROPS OPTH OTI
ophthalmic/otic drops
DROPS SUSP
drops suspension
DRP
drop
DRPS
drops
DSK
disk
DSPK
tablets in a dose pack
EAR DROP
EAR DROPS
EAR SUSP
ear suspension
EC TABS
enteric coated tablets
ECC
enteric coated capsules
ECT
enteric coated tablets
ELI
elixir
ELIX
elixir
ELIXIR
ELX
elixir
EMERGENCY KIT
ENEMA
ERTA
extended-release tablets
EXTN CAP
extended-release capsule
EXTRACT
EYE DRO
eye drop
EYE DROP
EYE DROPS
EYE SO
eye solution
FIL
film
FILM ER
film, extended-release
FILMTAB
FILMTABS
FOA
foam
FOAM
GAU
gauze
GAUZE
GEF
effervescent granules
GEL
GFS
gel-forming solution
GLOVE
GRA
granules
GRR
grams
GTT
drops
GUM
HOSE
medical hosiery
HU
capsule
ICR
control-release insert
IN
injectible
INH
inhalant
INH AER
inhalant aerosol
INHAL
inhalant
INHAL SOL
Inhalant solution
INHALER
INHL
inhalant
INJ
injectible
INJECTION (S)
INSULIN
IV
intravenous
JEL
jelly
JELLY
KIT
L
lotion
LANCET
LANCET (S)
LI
liquid
LIQ
liquid
LIQUID
LOT
lotion
LOTION
LOZ
lozenge
LOZENGE
MASK
MCG
microgram
MG
milligram
MIS
miscellaneous
MIST
MOUTHWASH
NAS
nasal spray
NASAL
NASAL INHALER
NASAL POCKET HL
nasal inhaler, pocket
NASAL SOLN
nasal solution
NASAL SPR
nasal spray
NASAL SPRAY
NDL
needle
NE
nebulizer
NEB
nebulizer
NEBULIZER
NMA
enema
NMO
nanomole, millimicromole
ODR
ophthalmic drop (ointment)
ODT
oral disintegrating tablet
OIL
OIN
ointment
OINT
ointment
OINT TOP
topical ointment
OINTMENT
ONT
ointment
OP
ophthalmic solution
OP DROPS
ophthalmic drops
OP SOL
ophthalmic solution
OPH S
ophthalmic solution or
suspension
OPH SOL
ophthalmic solution
OPH SOLN
ophthalmic solution
OPHTH DROP (S)
ophthalmic drops
OPHTH OINT
ophthalmic ointment
OPHTH SOLN
ophthalmic solution
OPT SLN
ophthalmic solution
OPT SOL
ophthalmic solution
OPTH
ophthalmic solution or
suspension or ointment
OPTH S
ophthalmic solution or
suspension
OPTH SLN
ophthalmic solution
OPTH SOL
ophthalmic solution
OPTH SUSP
ophthalmic suspension
OPTIC
ORAL
ORAL INHL
oral inhalant
ORAL PWD
oral powder
ORAL RINSE
ORAL SOL
oral solution
ORAL SUS
oral suspension
ORAL SUSP
oral suspension
OTI
otic solution
OTIC
OTIC SOL
otic solution
OTIC SOLN
otic solution
OTIC SUSP
otic suspension
PA
tablet pack, pad or patch
(varies)
PAC
pack
PAD
PADS
PAK
pack
PAS
paste
PAT
patch
PATCH
PCH
patch
PDR
powder
PDS
powder for reconstitution
PEDIATRIC DROPS
PI1
powder for injection, 1 month
PIH
powder for inhalation
PKG
package
PKT
packet
PLEDGETS
PO-SYRUP
syrup by mouth (oral syrup)
POPSICLE
POW
powder
POWD
powder
POWDER
POWDER/SUSPENS
powder/suspension
PRO
prophylactic
PULVULE
PWD
powder
PWD F/SOL
powder for solution
RCTL SUPP
rectal suppository
RECTAL CREAM
REDITABS
ROLL
S
syrup, suspension, solution
(varies)
SA CAPS
slow-acting capsules
SA TAB
slow-acting tablet
SA TABLETS
slow-acting tablets
SA TABS
slow-acting tablets
SAL
salve
SER
extended-release suspension
SGL
soft B23gel cap
SHA
shampoo
SHAM
shampoo
SHMP
shampoo
SHOE
SLT
sublingual tablet
SL TAB
sublingual tablet
SO
solution
SOL
solution
SOLN
solution
SOLUTION
SP
spray
SPONGE
SPR
spray
SPRAY
SRN
syringe
STP
strip
STR
strip
STRIP
STRIPS
SU
suspension, solution,
suppository, powder, or
granules for reconstitution
(varies)
SUB
sublingual
SUP
suppository
SUPP
suppository
SUPPOSITORIES
SUPPOSITORY
SUS
suspension
SUS/LIQ
suspension/liquid
SUSP
suspension
SUSPEN
suspension
SUSPENDED RELEASE
CAPLET
SUSPENSION
SWA
swab
SWAB
SWABS
SYP
syrup
SYR
syrup
SYRINGE
SYRP
syrup
SYRUP
T
tablet
T12
12 hour extended-release
tablet
T24
24 hour extended-release
tablet
TA
tablet
TAB
tablet
TAB CHEW
chewable tablet
TAB DR
delayed-release tablet
TAB EC
enteric coated tablet
TAB SL
slow-acting tablet
TABL
tablet
TABLET (S)
TABLETS (S)
TABS
tablets
TAP
tape
TAPE
TB
tablet
TBCH
chewable tablet
TBSL
sublingual tablet
TBSR
slow-release tablet
TCP
tablet, coated particles
TDM
extended-release film
TEF
effervescent tablet
TER
extended-release tablet
TES
test
TEST
TEST STRIP
TEST STRIPS
TIN
tincture
TOP CREAM
topical cream
TOP OINT
topical ointment
TOP SOL
topical solution
TOP SOLN
topical solution
TOPICAL CREAM
TOPICAL SOLUTION
TRO
troche
TUB
tube
TUBE
UNIT DOSE
UNT
unit
VAGINAL CREAM
VIAL
VIAL (S)
VIL
vial
WAF
wafer
WALKER
WIPES
Z-PAK

Return To Table Of Contents

 

Attachment 2

Definitions of Codes and Abbreviations for RXFRMUNT

Code

Description

-8

don't know

-9

not ascertained

CC

cubic centimeters

GM

grams

L

liters

ML

milliliters

OZ

ounces

Return To Table Of Contents

 

Attachment 3

Definitions of Abbreviations, Codes and Symbols for RXSTRUNT

Abbreviations,
Codes and Symbols

Definition

-7

refused

-8

don't know

-9

not ascertained

%

percent

09

compound

CC

cubic centimeters

DRP

drop

G

gram

GM

gram

GR

grain

HR or HRS

hour, hours

INH

inhalation

IU

international unit

MCG

microgram

MEQ

microequivalent

MG

milligram

ML

milliliter

MU

million units

SQ CM

square centimeter

U

units

Return To Table Of Contents

Return to the MEPS Homepage


MEPS HOME . CONTACT MEPS . MEPS FAQ . MEPS SITE MAP . MEPS PRIVACY POLICY . ACCESSIBILITY . VIEWERS & PLAYERS . COPYRIGHT
Back to topGo back to top
Back to Top Go back to top

Connect With Us

Facebook Twitter You Tube LinkedIn

Sign up for Email Updates

To sign up for updates or to access your subscriber preferences, please enter your email address below.

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

5600 Fishers Lane
Rockville, MD 20857
Telephone: (301) 427-1364

  • Careers
  • Contact Us
  • Español
  • FAQs
  • Accessibility
  • Disclaimers
  • EEO
  • Electronic Policies
  • FOIA
  • HHS Digital Strategy
  • HHS Nondiscrimination Notice
  • Inspector General
  • Plain Writing Act
  • Privacy Policy
  • Viewers & Players
  • U.S. Department of Health & Human Services
  • The White House
  • USA.gov