Skip to main content
U.S. flag
Health and Human Services Logo

An official website of the Department of Health & Human Services

menu-iconMore mobile-close-icon
mobile-back-btn-icon Back
  • menu-iconMenu
  • mobile-search-icon
AHRQ: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
  • Search All AHRQ Sites
  • Careers
  • Contact Us
  • Español
  • FAQs
  • Email Updates
MEPS Home Medical Expenditure Panel Survey
Font Size:
Contact MEPS FAQ Site Map  
S
M
L
XL
spacer
PUF Data Details > Publication Details
  Publication Details

Title:
   Evaluating an Alternative Data Source for Editing MEPS Drug Prices
Product type:
   Working Paper 12004
MEPS component:
   Household Component
Publication date:
   June 30, 2012
Description:
   Currently, the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) follow-back survey of pharmacies relies on the average wholesale unit price (AWUP) as a benchmark for identifying outlier prices. We assessed a potential alternative benchmark: median retail unit prices (RUPs) calculated from the MarketScan's database of private claims. Both the AWUP and median RUP are at the National Drug Code level. Using MarketScan and Medicare Part D claims data, we showed graphically the similarity of the distributions of unit prices for private insurance and Medicare Part D. This suggests that the median RUP may be useful for editing prices for two payment sources: private and Medicare. These two sources paid for 59.8% of drug expenditures in the MEPS population. Then we compared the accuracy of editing rules based on the AWUP and median RUP using a sample of MEPS pharmacy data validated by matching to Medicare Part D claims. In this selected sample, using the median RUP instead of the AWUP would slightly increase the accuracy of edited prices for generics and single source brand name drugs. We applied both sets of editing rules to the 2007 MEPS pharmacy data and found similar edited generic prices, but the prices of brand name drugs would be somewhat lower using the median RUP. Thus, it is feasible but not particularly necessary to change the unit price benchmark. Changing the benchmark would likely slightly improve accuracy but create a small break in the comparability over time in the prices of brand name drugs and aggregate expenditures.
Author(s):
   Marc Zodet and Steven C. Hill and Samuel Zuvekas
Agency:
   Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
Source:
   Web Only
PDF link:
   data_files/publications/workingpapers/wp_12004.pdf (281 KB)
New search
  Back to search results   Printing tips   Notes on viewing and downloading files  

MEPS HOME . CONTACT MEPS . MEPS FAQ . MEPS SITE MAP . MEPS PRIVACY POLICY . ACCESSIBILITY . COPYRIGHT
Back to topGo back to top
Back to Top Go back to top

Connect With Us

Facebook Twitter You Tube LinkedIn

Sign up for Email Updates

To sign up for updates or to access your subscriber preferences, please enter your email address below.

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

5600 Fishers Lane
Rockville, MD 20857
Telephone: (301) 427-1364

  • Careers
  • Contact Us
  • Español
  • FAQs
  • Accessibility
  • Disclaimers
  • EEO
  • Electronic Policies
  • FOIA
  • HHS Digital Strategy
  • HHS Nondiscrimination Notice
  • Inspector General
  • Plain Writing Act
  • Privacy Policy
  • Viewers & Players
  • U.S. Department of Health & Human Services
  • The White House
  • USA.gov