Skip to main content
U.S. flag
Health and Human Services Logo

An official website of the Department of Health & Human Services

menu-iconMore mobile-close-icon
mobile-back-btn-icon Back
  • menu-iconMenu
  • mobile-search-icon
AHRQ: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
  • Search All AHRQ Sites
  • Careers
  • Contact Us
  • Español
  • FAQs
  • Email Updates
MEPS Home Medical Expenditure Panel Survey
Font Size:
Contact MEPS FAQ Site Map  
S
M
L
XL
spacer
Publication Details
  Publication Details

Title:
   Using Propensity Scores to Adjust Weights to Compensate for Dwelling Unit Level Nonresponse in the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey
Product type:
   Working Paper 4004
MEPS component:
   Household Component
Publication date:
   December 21, 2004
Description:
   The Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) is sponsored by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). MEPS, a complex national probability sample survey, is conducted to provide nationally representative estimates of health care use, expenditures, sources of payment, and insurance coverage for the U.S. civilian noninstitutionalized population. It comprises three component surveys with the Household Component (HC) as the core survey. The MEPS-HC, like most sample surveys, experiences unit nonresponse despite efforts to maximize response rates. Survey nonresponse is usually compensated for by some form of weighting adjustment to reduce the bias in survey estimates. Currently, a weighting class nonresponse adjustment using socio-economic and demographic variables to create the weighting classes is used in the MEPS to adjust for potential nonresponse bias at the dwelling unit level. An alternative method for forming nonresponse adjustment cells is to use response propensities. This paper summarizes research undertaken to investigate various potential use of response propensities to adjust weights to compensate for nonresponse in the MEPS. Survey estimates for selected survey components, CVs, distribution of weights, and nonresponse adjustment methods at the dwelling unit level are compared and methodological issues discussed.
Author(s):
   Lap-Ming Wun, Trena M. Ezzati-Rice, Robert Baskin, Janet Greenblatt, Marc Zodet, Frank Potter, Nuria Diaz-Tena, Mourad Touzani
Agency:
   Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
Source:
   Web Only Publication
PDF link:
   data_files/publications/workingpapers/wp_04004.pdf (77 KB)
New search
  Back to search results   Printing tips   Notes on viewing and downloading files  

MEPS HOME . CONTACT MEPS . MEPS FAQ . MEPS SITE MAP . MEPS PRIVACY POLICY . ACCESSIBILITY . COPYRIGHT
Back to topGo back to top
Back to Top Go back to top

Connect With Us

Facebook Twitter You Tube LinkedIn

Sign up for Email Updates

To sign up for updates or to access your subscriber preferences, please enter your email address below.

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

5600 Fishers Lane
Rockville, MD 20857
Telephone: (301) 427-1364

  • Careers
  • Contact Us
  • Español
  • FAQs
  • Accessibility
  • Disclaimers
  • EEO
  • Electronic Policies
  • FOIA
  • HHS Digital Strategy
  • HHS Nondiscrimination Notice
  • Inspector General
  • Plain Writing Act
  • Privacy Policy
  • Viewers & Players
  • U.S. Department of Health & Human Services
  • The White House
  • USA.gov